|
Hi Group,
Quickly I must apologize to you members of this group
for wasting even more of your time on this subject. This is my
last post on the subject I promise.
Cy Galley
Editor, EAA Safety Programs wrote:
"Your example of Wright's "Falling Waters" is poor. It did
fail."
(actually it's "Fallingwater" - one word & no
"s")
I have pilgrimaged to Bear Run no less than 14
times. Each time I visit I find something new and wonderful to
experience. I'm sure scores of people who have visited the site from
all over the world during its 66 year history would agree. It has
survived a flash flood (1956), major storms in which on one occasion a
portion of the terrace beams were knocked down by a falling tree (1982).
Not to mention the numerous ventilation holes cut into every
terrace by the owners (1937-1963). A failure you say
sir?... shame on you Mr. Galley and may the gods of architecture have mercy
on your soul (I'm joking of course) . We can debate
architecture if you like but this is not the time or place. Personally, I would have been more interested in the opinions of the
"Editor, EAA Safety Programs" on the other 80% or so of my post regarding
the engine design.
As for Mr. Wasti. Your opinions are of no interest
to me and therefore I have no comment.
Look group all I'm saying is: Then engine exists
- the torpedo's in the water - no one can stop it now, lets just see
if its a hit.
Now back to my turbine.....
best regards,
Joe Trepicone
|