Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #14930
From: Bill & Sue <harrelson@erols.com>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] LNC2 Performance vs Altitude
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 12:33:18 -0400
To: <lml>
 
There are other items that affect a successful and quick flight.  9000 ft doesn't get you over every mountain, into a 50 Kt tailwind, or out of all turbulence.  I just find my cross country performance has been best at 7500, 8000, 8500 and 9000 ft altitudes, all other things being equal.
Yes, I agree, all other things being equal.  They usually aren't though. I had mine at FL210 only once and the object was just to see if it would do it. The airplane was barely hanging in the air. With full throttle I was probably getting what, maybe 20% power? I don't think that it would be a practical altitude except in extremely limited circumstances. I have, however, found the altitudes between 10 and 18 to be quite reasonable (with oxygen). In the winter going east you can gain substantial ground speeds over altitudes below 10 and often a smoother ride. Ya just gotta match the altitude to the mission circumstances and have oxygen if you're going high. 
 
Bill
N5ZQ   LNC2   O-320 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster