Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:49:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r06.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.102] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b6) with ESMTP id 1689577 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:37:46 -0400 Received: from AVIDWIZ@aol.com by imo-r06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v33.5.) id q.10d.168a7003 (16111) for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:37:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from aol.com (mow-d06.webmail.aol.com [205.188.138.70]) by air-id12.mx.aol.com (v87.22) with ESMTP id MAILINID123-0816183736; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:37:36 -0400 X-Original-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:39:36 -0400 From: AVIDWIZ@aol.com X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Lance has a new Nickname for IVP Owners X-Original-Message-ID: <1AD43B72.30A52574.001476CA@aol.com> X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hey Guys, If you check out the Article on Lancair and their road to certification of the Columbia 300 in the September 2002 issue of Kitplanes you'll find a reference Lance makes to the development of the IVP and its customer base. Interestingly, he says when Lancair developed the IVP he knew he would get (customers) which were the "low hanging fruit" (wealthy professionals). LOW HANGING FRUIT??? Should we be insulted or complimented? Dave Riggs