Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:32:12 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mailrelay.udlp.com ([207.109.1.10] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b6) with ESMTP id 1689399 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:25:14 -0400 Received: from asdmngwia.mpls.udlp.com (asdmngwia.mpls.udlp.com [10.1.62.22]) by mailrelay.udlp.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g7GIP6i31553 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:25:07 -0500 Received: from DM-MN-06-MTA by asdmngwia.mpls.udlp.com with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:25:02 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.1 X-Original-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:24:45 -0500 From: "Christopher Zavatson" X-Original-To: Subject: [LML] Re: LNC2: Hydraulic Cylinder Overhaul Warning Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Rick, As an additional note, I did not investigate the root cause of the failure to any great extent. Was it a design issue- too little, too much compression, bad batch of washers, dimensional differences between old Aerotek and current cylinders, damage during installation(no lubrication), etc? I am curious how many other damaged washers may have been discovered. The two bad washer I replaced were both original units from Aerotek, purchased in '95, in use since '97 and failed/discovered in '01 (~500 hours). Unfortunately, or fortunately, the washer can function normally, even when damaged, as long as a leak path from high to low pressure is not created. Chris >>> RicArgente@cs.com 08/16/02 09:57AM >>> In a message dated 08/16/2002 12:42:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time, marv@lancaironline.net writes: > Failure occurred before I even knew the washer existed. Then it only makes sense that this particular washer should be included with the rebuilt kit... At least now, thanks to you, we now know where these washers can be readily purchased. Rick