Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:32:12 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.san.yahoo.com ([209.132.1.30] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b6) with ESMTP id 1689401 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:27:59 -0400 Received: from paul (206.71.105.198) by mail.san.yahoo.com (6.5.026.2) (authenticated as naf@britevalley.com) id 3D5CCD9B0002343C for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:26:04 -0700 From: "Paul Nafziger" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: RE: [LML] 320 airflow X-Original-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:27:44 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 <> <> <<1. Is this normal for the 320 wing?>> -- This is normal for any wing that I'm aware of. <<2. Is it a good thing, as in less drag?>> -- It's a needed thing when one gets the proper pressure distribution over the wing. Winglets or end-plating the wing or installing fences will reduce it. <<3. Do other flyers notice the same phenomena?>> Probably. <<4. Why is this happening if we are to expect spanwise (outward) flow of air over the wing?>> I think of it like this. The movement of the wing through the air causes higher pressure on the bottom than on the top. (I won't start the argument about why this isn't the mechanism that directly creates lift, but it doesn't. ) The air "tries" to seek the lower pressure on the top side of the wing. One route is around the outer end of the wing, hence outward spanwise flow on the bottom of the wing, but inward spanwise on the top. You should see more spanwise flow at the tip decreasing to essentially none at the root. "Are these dumb questions?" -- Of course not. Questions are how we learn. Naf LNC2 N7PN