Return-Path: Received: from mail1.bctel.ca (nfs1.bctel.ca [207.194.28.66]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 23:20:49 -0500 Received: from a1a72249 (srry01m01-25.bctel.ca [207.194.16.25]) by mail1.bctel.ca with SMTP id UAA28162 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 20:22:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <006d01be32e3$3e060720$1910c2cf@a1a72249> From: "William R. Olsen" To: Subject: Reflexed Ailerons Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 20:25:14 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> In response to Dan Schaeafer's message about reflexing the ailerons as is done with the flaps I to am interested in doing this in my 235. I first read about reflexing the ailerons in the Lancair 200 Mail newsletter, April 1988, Volume 03, Issue 04. As part of the "320 Update" the author wrote that during the initial flight test "the harmony between pitch and roll was considerably closer than with the 235 model for several reasons." The third point listed was that "the ailerons were rigged to a 7 degree reflexed position all the time which measurably reduced the load on them." I am not yet at the stage of construction when I can offer any real solutions other than to say that it appears that reflexed ailerons were tried successfully, at least initially. I do not know if the current 320's and 360's still have a reflexed aileron. Please let me know if you decide to proceed and if so, how your aircraft changes. Good Luck Bill Olsen