Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:36:39 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [32.97.166.34] (HELO prserv.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b6) with ESMTP id 1688860 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:52:54 -0400 Received: from oemcomputer (slip-32-102-188-73.tx.us.prserv.net[32.102.188.73]) by prserv.net (out4) with SMTP id <2002081523525320405td25ue>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 23:52:53 +0000 From: "Larry Henney" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: aerobatics X-Original-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:52:27 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <000001c244b6$d0cb0d60$49bc6620@oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Am I missing something here? Regarding the LNC2, my operating manual calls for empty wing aerobatics only. Has this requirement been reduced with the addition of spar caps on the lower wing skins or what? I am rather timid about doing aerobatics with more than a couple gallons in the wings. What has Lancair said to those of you without header tanks about Acro? Has anyone had a failure of there bottom wing skin? Have you done any calculations to feel good about 6 G's and a few gallons in the wings? FWIW, I've tumbled my plane on several occasions. None of these departures resulted in any significant unusual flight characteristics or incipient spins. Depending on which way is up I usually ease the back pressure and wait a potatoe. The nose falls through T-34 style. It's a very docile departing airplane. Yes like many have mentioned one wing tends to let go a bit earlier than the other. This causes no significant yaw affect and stall recovery is accomplished with minimal altitude loss. Larry Henney 360LH