Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.36]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 25 Dec 1998 16:42:29 -0500 Received: from ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com ([12.73.163.220]) by mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.05 118 121 101) with SMTP id <19981225214311.EQLS8062@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> for ; Fri, 25 Dec 1998 21:43:11 +0000 Message-ID: <001a01be303e$597e2f20$dca3490c@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> Reply-To: "Curtis Krouse" From: "Curtis Krouse" To: Subject: Fixed pitch prop vs. constant speed Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 13:39:53 -0600 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Hi LML! Merry Christmas!! Is anyone running a fixed pitch prop on a 320? If you are......what effect has it has on the climb performance or cruise performance in your opinion? Does the cons with respect to performance outweigh the cost and maintenance considerations of the constant speed option? Does anyone know if you can even use a fixed pitch prop on the 320? And if you can, which one? Thanks, Curtis N753K