Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 19:21:33 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1620901@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <gnelson@gt.rr.com>
Received: from ns3.elp.rr.com ([24.92.98.7] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b4)
  with ESMTP id 1620890 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 18:47:20 -0400
Received: from oemcomputer (cpe-66-25-242-207.gt.rr.com [66.25.242.207])
	by ns3.elp.rr.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id g67MlJi01067
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 16:47:19 -0600 (MDT)
X-Original-Message-ID: <035601c22618$0cf13480$cff21942@gt.rr.com>
From: "Greg Nelson" <gnelson@gt.rr.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1540032@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Best Glide Speed
X-Original-Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:40:25 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200

So,.....Lorn,.. finish your thought.  What is the best way to test for best
glide (not least sink) speed?  Many of us (I believe) have not adequately
defined and documented this flight parameter.              Thanks,   Greg
Nelson