|
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<< Lancair Builders' Mail List >>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
I, too, used the lead shot slurry method of balancing the control
surfaces. Like you guys, I added a little to compensate for the paint.
When I was installing the surfaces I found that I needed to add a
considerable amount of lead to compensate for the weight of the primer
and paint. Don't underestimate the weight of the paint. Like you
suggest, it is a lot easier to drill out the extra lead than to add more
in later.
I fixed the problem by digging out all of the slurried lead and then
melting in new lead. I suspended the control horms in an ice bath and
then very carefully poured molten lead into the control horn. This was
accomplished without marring the painted surface.
One thing I learned in the exercise is that solid lead is considerably
more dense than the lead slurry mixture - on the order of 40%. I was
astounded by this. You can check it yourself by pouring lead shot into
a mixing cup. Mark the level of the shot with a marking pen. Weigh the
cup. Now pour water into the cup up to the level of the shot. Weigh
the cup again and take the difference - this is the weight of the water
in the spaces between the lead shots.
Now pour out the lead/water and refill the cup with water to the line
earlier marked and weigh the cup. Again, weigh the cup empty and take
the difference.
You can now compare the weight of the "solid" water to the weight of the
water "in the spaces" to see how much more dense the solid lead would
be. Check it - you'll be amazed.
Using solid lead, rather than the slurry, will get you more increase in
counterweight density than going from solid lead to depleted uranium and
you won't glow in the dark.
Hal 360HW
|
|