Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 19:48:26 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r07.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.103] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b2) with ESMTP id 1294814 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 13:30:45 -0400 Received: from Buzzie88@aol.com by imo-r07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id q.191.86d8b4c (16781) for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 13:30:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Buzzie88@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <191.86d8b4c.2a3e253b@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 13:30:35 EDT Subject: Stall Srips X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509 There has been recent discussion regarding the addition of Stall Strips on our Lancair aircraft. I would like some information and help from builders who have added and flown with these strips, i.e., location on wing leading edges, length x width x height. What are the negatives that may result from this aerodynamic modification? My spam-can and many other certified aircraft have stall strips installed. But, are we builders crossing more into the test pilot mode by modifying our wings? I say this even as I lean toward adding strips. Thanks in advance for your thoughts & ideas. Buz McAbery Tulsa, OK ES-156, maybe 75% N82BM