Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:51:06 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from gateway.wvi.com ([204.119.27.10] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b2) with ESMTP id 1291920 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 01:50:44 -0400 Received: from dpske.wvi.com (sta-m7-5.wvi.com [65.170.4.65]) by gateway.wvi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0163A3C4FA4 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:50:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020612224059.00a26a80@gateway.wvi.com> X-Sender: dpske@gateway.wvi.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:47:36 -0700 X-Original-To: (Lancair Mailing List) From: Don Skeele Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 360 Stall Speed/Buffet Speed In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Because if you don't have a good bit of altitude and the skills to recover from a spin and/or an inverted spin, you won't need to try another one !!! They are very docile A/C except they try to go inverted in a departure type stall. Trust me, if it weren't for some spin recovery techniques learned in a T-34 you would not be reading this post.. regards Don Skeele 235/320 At 12:47 PM 6/12/02 -0400, you wrote: >Posted for "Shannon Knoepflein" : > >can someone please explain to me why people are afraid to stall their >Lancairs? this makes no sense to me. I'm a low hour pilot, but I'd never >try to land in a plane or takeoff by myself without taking the plane to >stall and getting a "feel" for it and a "feel" for the recovery. Seems >strange, so someone please enlighten me. > >############################################################# >For archives see the LML website: http://www.lancaironline.net/maillist.html >LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair