Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 11:10:48 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay3.dc3.adelphia.net ([24.50.78.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b1) with ESMTP id 1236282 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 13 May 2002 10:52:46 -0400 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by smtprelay3.dc3.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GW21BY00.LBB for ; Mon, 13 May 2002 10:52:46 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: engines for IVP X-Original-Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 07:49:29 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 <> Okay, but I don't get the point. You imply that the EngineAir block is made by Dart for race cars. What I would like to know has more to do with the stiffness of the deck, alignment of the main bearing bores, porosity of the casting - not why someone made it. Other implications of "business practices," etc. don't help me much. I understand that Dart, for instance, has been in business for a long time and I don't know of anything bad about their products. Too many people take too much time spewing these vague generalities, apparently to imply that the truth is only known by a precious few - and it needs to stay that way. I'd like to see everything out in the open. Gary Casey ES project