Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 21:00:38 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.4] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b1) with ESMTP id 1235267 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 11 May 2002 20:27:50 -0400 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id q.124.109990ae (16781) for ; Sat, 11 May 2002 20:27:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <124.109990ae.2a0f10ff@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 20:27:43 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: FADEC X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10500 Jack, One of the things you wrote was: <... I am not sure that the Unison system is a real solution.> Surely you mean EPIC for Lycomings (like FADEC for Continentals). If so, I agree that much needs to be resolved. PRISM does sound like a more technically correct approach for the future fuels. However, today, LASAR (a Unison product) works quite nicely with 100LL and the backup is decades old, magnetos. Personally, I am looking forward to a 300 HP, liquid cooled Rotax working with a future no-lead fuel.. Scott Krueger