Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 20:02:07 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r08.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b1) with ESMTP id 1235095 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 11 May 2002 15:49:50 -0400 Received: from Epijk@aol.com by imo-r08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id q.1ac.2206e06 (4560) for ; Sat, 11 May 2002 15:49:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Epijk@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1ac.2206e06.2a0ecfdc@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 15:49:48 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Engine For The IVP X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1ac.2206e06.2a0ecfdc_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10503 --part1_1ac.2206e06.2a0ecfdc_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/10/2002 7:34:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time, atphiltec@mindspring.com writes: <<<...I was aware of the Engine Air engine. Clearly, here again, major controversy exists...>>> RESPONDING, In a message dated 5/11/2002 11:40:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time, rickschrameck@lvcm.com writes: <<<...contact me off line...if you want some truthful information...on EngineAir... AND ...If you really want an EngineAir engine I know where you could get one at a real cheap price...>>> TO atphiltec: AFTER you have communicated with Schramek, and before you consider buying the so-called "EngineAir" engine he mentioned, (1) visit our website ( www.epi-eng.com) and (2) be sure to contact me offline (jack@epi-eng.com) for the other side of the story about that particular engine: how long it actually flew, the "problems" it had (resulting from the owner thinking that he and his drag-race buddies knew more about both the engine and gearbox than did the designers), about the failures caused by the owner damaging delicate parts, etc. etc. etc. I would also be happy to discuss the IO-550 v. EngineAir question with you further. Jack Kane EPI, Inc. --part1_1ac.2206e06.2a0ecfdc_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/10/2002 7:34:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time, atphiltec@mindspring.com writes:

<<<...I was aware of the Engine Air engine.
Clearly, here again, major controversy exists...>>>

RESPONDING, In a message dated 5/11/2002 11:40:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time, rickschrameck@lvcm.com writes:

<<<...contact me off line...if you want some truthful information...on EngineAir...
AND
...If you really want an EngineAir engine I know where you could get one at a real cheap price...>>>

TO atphiltec:

AFTER you have communicated with Schramek, and before you consider buying the so-called "EngineAir" engine he mentioned, (1) visit our website (www.epi-eng.com) and (2) be sure to contact me offline (jack@epi-eng.com) for the other side of the story about that particular engine: how long it actually flew, the "problems" it had (resulting from the owner thinking that he and his drag-race buddies knew more about both the engine and gearbox than did the designers), about the failures caused by the owner damaging delicate parts, etc. etc. etc.

I would also be happy to discuss the IO-550 v. EngineAir question with you further.
Jack Kane
EPI, Inc.
--part1_1ac.2206e06.2a0ecfdc_boundary--