Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 13:36:04 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com ([204.127.198.38] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b1) with ESMTP id 1220812 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 04 May 2002 12:39:46 -0400 Received: from computer ([12.254.128.124]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20020504163948.SZZD9799.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@computer> for ; Sat, 4 May 2002 16:39:48 +0000 From: "family" X-Original-To: "___Lancair list" Subject: panel paint X-Original-Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 10:45:00 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003A_01C1F358.BDC8A740" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C1F358.BDC8A740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am painting my panel right now and wondered if any of you had any opinions on flat vs.. gloss (or semi-gloss) for tradeoffs in reflection verse ease of cleaning Scott Dahlgren 801-373-0616 mailto:spdahlgren@attbi.com ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C1F358.BDC8A740 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am = painting my=20 panel right now and wondered if any of you had any opinions on flat vs.. = gloss=20 (or semi-gloss) for tradeoffs in reflection verse ease of=20 cleaning

Scott Dahlgren
801-373-0616
mailto:spdahlgren@attbi.com

------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C1F358.BDC8A740--