Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 849103 for rob@logan.com; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 01:49:24 -0400 Received: from imo-m10.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.165]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 01:24:15 -0400 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-m10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31.9.) id k.129.2bf1367 (18411) for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 01:34:15 -0400 (EDT) From: RWolf99@aol.com Message-ID: <129.2bf1367.28a4cc56@aol.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 01:34:14 EDT Subject: Bolt Torques To: lancair.list@olsusa.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> In a message dated 8/9/2001 9:26:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time, lancair.list@olsusa.com writes: << Since both front and rear spar bolts go thru glass and phenolic, 43-13 guidelines do not apply here. >> Hey, what gives here? I torqued the firewall bolts holding on my engine mount to the 43-13 guidelines, but I noticed slight dishing of the area washers. I thought the bolt torque was too tight, but didn't want to go any less. Any of you experts out there have any suggestions? - Rob Wolf LNC2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>