Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b1) with ESMTP id 810908 for rob@logan.com; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:27:05 -0400 Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.62]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:09:54 -0400 Received: from 216-164-234-10.s10.tnt2.frd.va.dialup.rcn.com ([216.164.234.10] helo=oemcomputer) by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with smtp (Exim 3.30 #2) id 15K0Dm-0005A8-00 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:18:46 -0400 Message-ID: <000a01c1095c$d31b2fa0$0aeaa4d8@oemcomputer> From: "Bill & Sue" To: References: <20010710054902.AAA13472@pop3.olsusa.com> Subject: LNC2 on grass Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:24:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > I will be buying a 2 seat Lancair soon (95% to 99.9% completed) and need > all the info I can get. > > What are the benefits of the 235, 320, vs 360? > I operate from a 1700ft grass airport, how well does the LNC2 hanldle grass? Hi Glenn, I have a 320 with 60 hours on it now. I thought long and hard about whether to put in an O-360 or an O-320. I decided on a 320 and am extremely happy with it. The O-360 is about 30 pounds heavier and requires a heavier prop (maybe another 30 pounds extra). This extra weight up in the nose requires more tail down force from the horizontal stab (trim drag). The extra weight requires carrying more fuel for a given trip which increases the weight even more. From what I've seen (definitely not a scientific study) the 360's climb very slightly better than the 320 and perhaps use 100 feet or so less runway to get off. In cruise I believe that the 320's and 360's end up at about the same speeds. At 10,500 feet, I'm getting an honest 180 knots TAS and burning 7 gallons per hour. (Lazar ignition helps with the fuel flow). I'm carrying 54 gallons with full tanks and flew a 1,000 nm leg the other day (5 hours 25 min) and landed with 2 hours fuel in the tanks. Can any of you 360 guys do that? I made my first grass landings the other day. I have the Ong's Debongers and standard gear on mine. I believe that the shock absorbers made the difference in landing on a grass strip. If the grass is dry, smooth, firm, unrutted with no holes for our little shopping cart wheels to fall into, no sandy spots...and if you have one of the shock absorbers other than the stock rubber rocks, then I believe that grass is fine. As for 1700 ft...I wouldn't do it. Bill Harrelson N5ZQ harrelson@erols.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>