Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b1) with ESMTP id 810864 for rob@logan.com; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:20:02 -0400 Received: from ocnet02.co.orange.ca.us ([206.194.127.110]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:03:13 -0400 Received: from oc_bridge.co.orange.ca.us (marty [206.194.124.99]) by ocnet02.co.orange.ca.us (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA18262; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 05:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bridge.co.orange.ca.us with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <3T4657AW>; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 05:06:26 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Brunner, Pat" To: "'lancair.list@olsusa.com'" Cc: "Susan Brunner (E-mail)" Subject: Flapper Door on Pickup Fuel Bay Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 05:11:16 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Just a note to second the comments on the likelihood of problems with the flapper door. I closed both wings and had them stored for several years waiting the day when they would be mated to the fuselage. I hadn't thought too much of the wings as the control surfaces, bellcranks and wiring all seemed in perfect working order. On a fluke of interest just prior to installing the wings I happened to take a light with a small head and flexible shaft and placed into the wing fuel sensing hole (old version sensor installed from the inboard end), and viewed through the fuel return opening. What I found scared me. Both wings had bonding material dripped in front of the slosh doors. I devised a 1/4" alum. tube with heavy wire through it and a hook at the end to see if the doors worked. They didn't. I could get some movement on each but not enough to feed the engine. A dremel tool with a flexible shaft and some stiffener (alum. tubing) for about 18" allowed me to remove the material very slowly without damaging the fuel sealer and wing. A test with the "door checking tool" and all was well. I shudder to think of the outcome if this check had not been done. It is likely that there would have been adequate fuel for a short hop but what about a long duration flight and high fuel demands? Next tip: Micro Vision requires their sensor to be calibrated by reading the resistance numbers as you fill the tank, two gallons at a time. This is a good means of "knowing" the total fuel your tanks hold. Mine both hold 39.3 gallons and when drained, there is at least 1/2 gallon unusable in each. Even if you sensors do not require the 2-gallon shuffle, it might be a good exercise to give you a sense for what the tanks really hold. Of course extreme care should be exercised with fuel. My advice is find a way to check the fuel slosh door prior to mating the wings. The peace of mind will be worth the effort. Pat Brunner N98PB 200 Hours and going strong! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>