From: RWolf99@aol.com
Message-ID: <8f.cc593f2.2874fe23@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:17:55 EDT
Subject: Re: Horizontal stabilizer incidence - LNC2
To: lancair.list@olsusa.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
In a message dated 7/3/2001 11:27:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
lancair.list@olsusa.com writes:

<< After a few months of flight on my Lancair 360 (MK II)  I have noticed that
 in level flight the leading edge of the elevator (the counterbalance area)
 is about 1/4" or 3/8" above the horizontal stabilizer.>>
 
 Matt -

If your CG is more forward, you would need more down force off the horizontal 
tail, thus the trailing edge of the tail should be more "up" to generate that 
extra tail down-force.  You have the opposite condition -- you need trailing 
edge down to get less down-force at the back end of the airplane.  Therefore, 
your suspicion that the forward CG is not the cause is correct.

You probably think you have more drag because of the deflected elevator, but 
then again, you might have less drag overall because the tail generates less 
downwards lift, you pay for that with less induced drag off the tail, plus 
your main wing has to generate less lift to compensate for the down force, so 
there's less induced drag off the main wing as well.  But probably you have 
the same down-force, gotten by having an elevator deflection because the 
stabilizer is too nose down.

Frankly, I don't think you could measure any of those effects on your 
airspeed indicator.  But you could run an experiment where you shift CG to 
get a different elevator trim position, and see if you notice a change in 
speed.  

Is the elevator position a problem, other than the obviously hideous 
appearance which makes your flying Lancair painful to look at?  (Major joke 
here...)  Or do you just want it level for aesthetic reasons?

Concerning the stick position, I suspect there is some ability to shorten 
your forward elevator pushrod to bring the stick aft and closer to vertical.  
If there's insufficient adjustment, I think you'll have to make a new 
pushrod, or cut some threads off the existing threaded rod ends.  Make sure 
you can't push a safety wire through the witness holes in the rod end bearing 
(but you know that).  Other than that, I see no problem in adjusting it.  

You could probably make the aft pushrod a little shorter as well, as long as 
you leave adequate clearance for the bob-weight.  But I'm less certain about 
this as I haven't gotten that far yet.

- Rob Wolf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html
LML Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>