Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 12:18:08 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r05.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.101] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 2034715 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 09:30:47 -0500 Received: from Wschertz2@aol.com by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id q.184.1769464e (4418) for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 09:30:44 -0500 (EST) From: Wschertz2@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <184.1769464e.2b8a3513@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 09:30:43 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Oversized pics X-Original-To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 140 In a message dated 2/22/2003 11:28:10 PM Central Standard Time, marv@lancaironline.net writes: > Subj: [FlyRotary] Re: Oversized pics > Date: 2/22/2003 11:28:10 PM Central Standard Time > From: marv@lancaironline.net (Marvin Kaye) > Sender: flyrotary@lancaironline.net (Rotary motors in aircraft) > Reply-to: flyrotary@lancaironline.net (Rotary motors in aircraft) > To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net (Rotary motors in aircraft) > > Posted for "Tom Kendall" : > > Sorry all. I've apparently not figured out how to manage this new camera > yet. Great resolution, but huge files. When I try to cut back on the file > size, the resolution goes to pieces. Aaaarrrrrgh. I'm using dial-up too, > and it about kills my old machine to send 'em. > > T ---------------------- Tom, Most digital cameras have different resolution settings. One I have borrowed has a seting for 640x480, which is adequate for internet mailing, because of the limited resolution of the screen. On pictures that I take with a film camera and get developed onto CD-rom, the pictures are ~1560x ?? and I use a program called Thumbs+ which can save a version (keeping the originals safe) in the lower resolution for emailing to people. Bill Schertz KIS Cruiser #4045