Return-Path: <btilley@mchsi.com>
Received: from sccmmhc92.asp.att.net ([204.127.203.212] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b7)
  with ESMTP id 310184 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 07:48:24 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.102] (12-216-199-181.client.mchsi.com[12.216.199.181])
          by sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92) with SMTP
          id <20040710114749m9200go9sje>; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:47:54 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618)
In-Reply-To: <list-310007@logan.com>
References: <list-310007@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <F725F858-D266-11D8-90DD-000A278AA19A@mchsi.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bob Tilley <btilley@mchsi.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: BOV more/less air flow
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 07:47:48 -0400
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618)

Ed,

Stupid question here!  Also wouldn't the lack of an exhaust system 
speed up the exhaust flow?(No backpressure) therefore increasing the 
speed of the turbine wheels?

Bob

On Jul 10, 2004, at 12:26 AM, Ed Anderson wrote: