Return-Path: Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.68] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b7) with ESMTP id 251207 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 18:07:22 -0400 Received: from bellsouth.net ([209.214.144.12]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040708220652.XAEM1701.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@bellsouth.net> for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 18:06:52 -0400 Message-ID: <40EDC575.5030805@bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:06:45 -0500 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: engine mount References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If you use any of the RTV's around oil retaining joints, there is a risk of extruding some into the oil system. I suspect that the ultimate result won't be that much better than what has happened to Lycosaurs. FWIW... Charlie Finn Lassen wrote: > If you use UltraGray or such, clean all mating surfaces with alcohol, > you will not need gaskets and this stuff will not come apart. Probably > won't even need the bolts :) > Of course it's next to impossible to ply the oil pan from the mount > plate if you ever want to take it apart. > > Finn > > Marvin Kaye wrote: > >> Bulent Aliev wrote: >> >> ""I safety wired the oil pickup bolts and used lock washers on all >> the oil pan bolts."" >> >> Rather than lock washers, wouldn't it make more sense to use drilled >> head bolts and safety them together in groups of 2 or 3? I know >> they're metric and probably not commercially readily available, but >> drilling them on a drill press wouldn't require too much effort. Use >> a 135 degree split point drill bit and you'll go through them like >> butter. Just a thought. >> >> >