Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.100] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b6) with ESMTP id 231404 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:31:29 -0400 Received: from EDWARD (clt25-78-058.carolina.rr.com [24.25.78.58]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i5U2UuPg021632 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:30:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001b01c45e4a$4bc4dc40$2402a8c0@EDWARD> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] BF-109F Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:31:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01C45E28.C47066E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C45E28.C47066E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I agree, Ken. However, I know the models of the ME109went at least to = the "G" model. So, we may have just not seen the model that did have it = - if the article was correct. It did not mention the ME109 = specifically, but figured it must be the model as the FW190 was a = radial. Ed Ed Anderson RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC ----- Original Message -----=20 From: kenpowell@comcast.net=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 9:09 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] BF-109F Hi Ed, I have also read this many times but have never seen a boundary layer = bleed on a BF-109. I have considered method this for my RV-4 and looked = at many pictures of the 109. Attached is a picture of an 'F' model. Ken Powell snip..... >One article I read indicated the American P-51 and German fighter = designers=20 > figured out the significance of keeping the boundary layer out of = the=20 > cooling ducts whereas the British supposedly continued to be = plagued with=20 > cooling problems with the Spitfires due to their cooling inlets = being partly=20 > in the boundary layer. FWIW=20 >=20 > Keep us apprised=20 >=20 > Ed=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C45E28.C47066E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I agree, Ken.  However, I know the = models of=20 the ME109went at least to the "G" model.  So, we may have just not = seen the=20 model that did have it - if the article was correct.  It did not = mention=20 the ME109 specifically, but figured it must be the model as the FW190 = was a=20 radial.
 
Ed
 
Ed Anderson
RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 kenpowell@comcast.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 = 9:09=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] = BF-109F

Hi Ed,

I have also read this many times but have never seen a boundary = layer bleed=20 on a BF-109.  I have considered method this for my RV-4 and = looked at=20 many pictures of the 109.  Attached is a picture of an 'F' = model.

Ken Powell

snip.....

 >One  article I read indicated the American P-51 = and German=20 fighter designers
> figured out the significance of keeping = the=20 boundary layer out of the
> cooling ducts whereas the British = supposedly continued to be plagued with
> cooling problems = with the=20 Spitfires due to their cooling inlets being partly
> in the = boundary=20 layer. FWIW
>
> Keep us apprised
>
> Ed=20

>>  Homepage: =20 http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>  Archive:  =20 = http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C45E28.C47066E0--