Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: FLYROTARY Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 12:08:57 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from out019.verizon.net ([206.46.170.98] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 2023828 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 12:07:35 -0500 Received: from ken.verizon.net ([67.225.117.96]) by out019.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.20 201-253-122-126-120-20021101) with ESMTP id <20030214170731.ZQWR18169.out019.verizon.net@ken.verizon.net> for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:07:31 -0600 X-Original-Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.0.20030214090855.009f2890@mail.verizon.net> X-Sender: res0c5l1@mail.verizon.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 X-Original-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:15:25 -0800 X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" From: Ken Welter Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] 6 to 4 ports In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed I like running 86 and later rotating mass with 84-85 GLSE rotor housings and 12 A side housings. The best would be to run third gen housings but they are hard to find. Ken Welter At 12:37 PM 2/13/03 -0500, you wrote: >Does anyone have an optimum configuration for the 13B as a NA engine? How >would you convert a 89 6 port to a 4 port engine? Just grind the end >housing ports to form one port? Or is there a 4 port type end housing >that could be used like a turbo II end housing. I am starting with a 88 >NA and a 89 NA. Thanks for any help. > >Joe Berki >Limo EZ > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/