Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b3) with ESMTP id 3222441 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 09 May 2004 00:59:30 -0400 Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.57]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040509045856.PWYC19283.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Sun, 9 May 2004 00:58:56 -0400 From: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: MPG Coolant Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 0:58:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040509045856.PWYC19283.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> Thats interesting, Marv. Does it have the same thermal conductivity and specific heat as water? Dave Leonard > > I think what you're referring to is Evans NPG. We have to run it in the > Eagle540 because of the magnesium heads and intake manifold. It's a bit > pricey, at around $25/gal, and if you've had 50/50 water/anti-freeze in the > system you need to 1) flush & purge the system with clean water, 2) drain well > and blow out with air, then 3) use the Evans "purge" fluid that binds with the > last of the water in the system. 4) Drain that and fill with NPG. We had to > send back a sample of coolant after the first engine run to verify that 99% of > the water had been removed prior to filling... we did ok. What seems really > strange is to have a recommendation from Evans that says to use a zero psi > cap... although they did say it's ok to use one up to about 7psi if you really > need to have a pressurized system. Interesting stuff. > > > > > > : > > One of the guys at the airport says that "all" the subaru guys are using > something called MPG instead of Ethylene Glycol/water because it boils at 290 > without need to be pressurized. > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >