Message-ID: <010b01c43549$eb7dc730$0202a8c0@eric>
From: "Eric Ruttan" <ericruttan@chartermi.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-3221416@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Web hosting was : [FlyRotary] Re: Intake manifold tuning
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 18:15:07 -0400

Ed we would love to host the files on the canardaviation forum.

John Slade and Michael Skorija and myself run the place.  We could set up
your own forum for Fly Rotary files if you wish.  We would be glad to have
you.  18 MB is nothing and I belive it would add great value to the rotary
community.

You might need to register to post the files, but they would be free to get
for anyone.

If you dont feel that best fits your needs we can give you a directory, for
example
canardaviation.com/flyrotary/

The files may seem esoteric now, but I think interest in understanding these
ideas is growing and open peer review is always good.

I dont wish to pester you about it.  We have an avid rotary community in the
canard community, even more so with John flying now, so I thought it would
be a good fit.

Again if I can help in any way let me know.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 8:35 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Web hosting was : [FlyRotary] Re: Intake manifold
tuning


> Good point, Eric
>
>     I certain am not biased against Canards (even if they have the engine
on
> the wrong end {:>)), I seriously considered a Long EZ but concluded that
my
> flying needs (and reluctance to get into composite construction) dictated
> that the RV was the better aircraft for my purposes.
>
>    I hesitate to post things that I have posted before so as not to unduly
> clutter up the list especially when they may be consider somewhat esoteric
> by most.  I keep telling myself I should establish my own web site (my
> aircraft stuff is hosted on another individual's web site) to host such
> items.
>
> Right now I have several things that might be of interest.
>
> I have two spreadsheets that calculate power, fuel burn, rpm, BTU
generated
> and some crude cooling models for both the NA and Turbo 13B which data has
> shown to have a fairly good correlation with what folks are reporting.
>
> I have over 18MB of presentation slides and "Formal" derivation of the
> Rotary Dynamic Intake Effect analysis.  Its composed of 67 slides
> (PowerPoint) which is why its so large a file.  Even zipped its 12 MB
>
> I have other bits and pieces from the Hemlhotz equation adapted for the
> rotary to cooling duct coordinate generators, to some early analysis of
the
> cooling effectiveness of the Gm evaporator cores used by many.
>
> I hesitate to impose such a mess on anybody's web site.  What I need to do
> it check with my Service Provider, they provide a 5 MB size web page
hosting
> for free.  I would need more than that, but it might be reasonable.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion about the Canard list.
>
> Ed
>
>
> Ed Anderson
> RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
> Matthews, NC
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eric Ruttan" <ericruttan@chartermi.net>
> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 12:42 AM
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake manifold tuning
>
>
> > Ed;
> > I know you have posted this mathematical stuff before to this list, but
> > there are new members all the time, and some may not have been
interested
> > when this was first posted, but they may have become more willing to
> follow
> > the math more closely.
> >
> > Might I suggest a posting of the relevant files to a web site.  Easy to
> > reference and centralized , and the latest corrected version always
> > available are just a few advantages.
> >
> > I am sure there are a bunch of us capable of hosting these files, but I
> will
> > go further to suggest as forum such as
> > www.canardaviation.com/fourm
> > you could post the files in a thread there, or if you would prefer a new
> > forum could be created.  It would be easy to reference and you can edit
an
> > attached file to the latest version at any time.
> >
> > Please do not let the canard bias your decision.
> > We have no problem with those that choose to make their planes backward.
> :)
> > Again, any host will due.  If I may be of assistance please ask.
> >
>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
> >
>
>
>
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html