Return-Path: Received: from [199.185.220.223] (HELO priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with ESMTP id 3187701 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 05:29:56 -0400 Received: from Endurance ([216.232.251.181]) by priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.00.05.02 201-2115-109-103-20031105) with SMTP id <20040424092955.ZPTV16493.priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net@Endurance> for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 03:29:55 -0600 From: "Haywire" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: 2.85 redrive Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 02:29:51 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: While I didn't foresee the success of the 2.85 redrive, I did want to keep my options open, so I built the VS with zero offset and the engine mount as well with zero offset and just use shims to offset the mount. This has worked exceptionally well, so I don't expect that there would be much difficulty in switching to the 2.85 if that turns out to be the combination of choice for my needs. The question(s) that remain are, first how much $$$ to switch over? Second is, how will this perform for cruise economy? Third is, I already can outclimb any Lycosaurus at our field with using the turbo, what's next? S. Todd Bartrim (probably shouldn't be making these claims while under the influence of barley :-) (no.... I wouldn't be the drunken guy snoring at sun-n-fun, I 'd be the drunken guy hitting on the gorgeous red-haired fiddle player :-) Turbo 13B RV-9Endurance C-FSTB http://www3.telus.net/haywire/RV-9/C-FSTB.htm "Whatever you vividly imagine, Ardently desire, Sincerely believe in, Enthusiastically act upon, Must inevitably come to pass". > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On > Behalf Of daveleonard@cox.net > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 9:38 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 2.85 redrive > > > > I hear your pain Rusty. I have offsets in both my engine mount > and vertical stab. I'm a RD-1B guy forevermore. > > Dave Leonard > > > > Well, 'bout ready to place my order for my Monster 76/88 prop from > > Performance Propellers. Tracy's is 74/88 but he feels that > with the 2.85 > > even longer diameter props can be accommodated. If too much prop, Clark > > Lydick will trim the diameter. So will ship my RD-1B to Tracy > to have it > > converted to a 2.85 RD-1C after I finish attending a couple > more flyins in > > May. Hard to get his "vertical" take off out of my mind. > > > > Ed > > > > > > Do you have a left offset in your mount? I sure wish I didn't, but it > > seemed like a good idea at the time. Now I just can't stomach the > > monumental re-work that would be required to go back to zero offset. > > > > Rusty (hoping Tracy's old prop will make me feel better) > > > > > > >