Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.202.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with ESMTP id 3187430 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:14:27 -0400 Received: from 204.127.205.150 ([204.127.205.150]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004042403142701600cps2ae>; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 03:14:27 +0000 Received: from [68.51.45.250] by 204.127.205.150; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 03:14:26 +0000 From: kenpowell@comcast.net To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Wanted RV-4 dynafocal mount Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 03:14:26 +0000 Message-Id: <042420040314.10747.4089DB92000A257C000029FB2200751150FF93939A88908F919A@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Apr 12 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VucG93ZWxsQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 Thanks Mike, I knew that there were different lengths but didn't know the details. Ken Powell > At 19:28 2004-04-23, you wrote: > >Looking for an old mount for a bargain price. Any of you guys that > >converted to long legs have a short leg mount you want to part with for a > >salvage price? I'm working on an engine stand project and need a dynafocal > >1 mount preferably for an RV-4. > > > >Located in Portland, OR, so closer is better but I'll consider anything > >within reasonable shipping distance. > > > >No need to reply to the whole list, email me back directly. > > > >Do not archive > > > >Thanks, > >Mike > > > >Mike McGee, RV-4 N996RV, O320-E2G, Hillsboro, OR > >13B in gestation mode, RD-1C, EC-2 > >-------------------------------- > >Mike, > >I bought my RV-4 mount about 2 years ago - do I have the short or the long > >legs? How do I know, ie., how long are the 'short' and how long are the > >'long'? > > > >Thanks, > >Ken Powell > > > You've got the long legs. I don't have measurements for the difference > between the two. I think the original was designed to accommodate a 70" > prop and the later revision will accommodate a 72". This is in order to > have a certain ground clearance as specified by Van. I think it's 6" when > the fuse is level. > > You have to go back to about the mid 90s to find the short legs. The long > legs were a revision to accommodate longer props on 180 hp engines. The > original RV-4s were designed for an O-320, not an O-360. Then all those > old ex-hot-rodders got into building airplanes... > > Mike McGee, RV-4 N996RV, O320-E2G, Hillsboro, OR > 13B in gestation mode, RD-1C, EC-2 > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html