Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 08:11:39 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <13brv3@mchsi.com> Received: from sccmmhc02.mchsi.com ([204.127.203.184] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.3) with ESMTP id 1940446 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 18:54:36 -0500 Received: from rad ([12.218.64.232]) by sccmmhc02.mchsi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20021227235436.DADL5896.sccmmhc02.mchsi.com@rad> for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:54:36 +0000 Reply-To: <13brv3@mchsi.com> From: <13brv3@mchsi.com> X-Original-To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Ordered my EWP X-Original-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 17:54:26 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <000001c2ae03$4d0f52e0$0201a8c0@rad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C2ADD1.0274E2E0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C2ADD1.0274E2E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I presume you will be using the GM cores? Nope, though I can see why you would think that. I'm going cheekless, and plan to use a single radiator under the engine. Back when I borrowed your old core for testing, I was working on an unusual radiator idea, and had built a small prototype for testing against a known core. It was a wacky idea, and would probably work, but probably not as efficiently as a good conventional radiator. I haven't decided if I'll pursue it any further. Bet you're curious now :-) Rusty 13B powered RV-3 (experimental aircraft)...Be Afraid :-) 1993 RX-7 R1... Mods underway, tickets to follow ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C2ADD1.0274E2E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
I presume you will be using the GM=20 cores?
 
Nope, though=20 I can see why you would think that.   I'm going = cheekless, and=20 plan to use a single radiator under the engine.  Back when I = borrowed=20 your old core for testing, I was working on = an unusual radiator=20 idea, and had built a small prototype for testing against a known=20 core.  It was a wacky idea, and would probably work, but=20 probably not as efficiently as a good conventional=20 radiator.  I haven't decided if I'll pursue it any = further.  Bet=20 you're curious now  :-)
 
Rusty
13B powered RV-3 (experimental aircraft)...Be = Afraid=20 :-)
1993 RX-7 R1... Mods underway, tickets to=20 follow
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C2ADD1.0274E2E0--