Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.163.168] (account ) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0.2) with HTTP id 1930708 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:01:06 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Intakes To: flyrotary X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0.2 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:01:06 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <00b401c2a736$86d87340$fece540c@computer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Tom Kendall" : ----- Original Message ----- > After lurking on the list for a while I see most folks > are using some combination of the lower intake > manifold with custom fabricated runners. It seems > everyone is using metal and not composites for the > intakes. Are there a particular reasons for this? > Like heat, vibration, etc.? Can't speak for everybody else, but you nailed the reasons for metal on my choice of material: the intake is very close to the exhaust manifold (and, in my case, the intended turbo-charger). I don't like the idea of plastic of any kind as the only thing between a pressurized air/fuel mixture and a 1,000+ degree exhaust pipe or turbo! Aluminum is a tried & proven material for intake manifolds, and considering bolt stress concentrations, thermal growth considerations, vibration, etc, it seems to be appropriate for the application. Some people have used fiberglass or carbon composites for the intake runners, and these seem to work fine. But again, I'm concerned about the bonding or sealing of the two different materials together and the potentially disastrous effects of an in-flight failure there. So it'll be brazed or welded metal for the intake runners and everything back until I'm upstream of my fuel injectors and well away from the heat. Dynamic charging is certainly feasible, especially since in an aircraft application you can optimize it to a single RPM for maximum climb out power / performance. Dynamic charging is to maximize horsepower by getting a little extra boost. Doesn't make sense to tune for anything but the high end since you could do the same by simply opening the throttle wider. So it won't buy you anything for cruise performance. Intake runner length is the critical tuning parameter for dynamic charging; what is happening is that a pressure pulse is created at the end of the intake stroke when the intake port suddenly closes and the air starts "piling up" behind the now shut port. This pulse moves back up stream through the runner until it hits a big change in diameter (i.e. the intake plenum). At that point the runner has a higher pressure/density than the intake plenum. It is "supercharged". But now things start to unwind: the air in the runner starts to move back into the lower pressure plenum (especially since the port on the other rotor can be opening up right about now and dropping plenum pressure even lower). If you can make it work out so that the time it takes that pressure pulse to travel to the plenum is the same time as it takes the rotor to move to the next intake cycle, then you have a pre-charged runner that dumps into the combustion chamber as the port opens up. Clearly, the length of the runner is critical and depends on the speed of the engine. The faster the engine is turning, the shorter the runner can be. A longer runner is fine. Just not a shorter one. IIRC, the critical length at 6,000 rpm is about 20". Could be way wrong on that, and others on this page will know better. Runner diameter is not as critical, though common sense will tell you that the larger the diameter, the more air can be packed into it and the less resistance there will be to flow (i.e. less pressure drop). There is a limit though: Too big, and the velocity is so low during the intake stroke that you won't develop any significant charging pressure pulse. The pressure pulse height is inversely proportional to the area of the runner. Another trade-off. But if you keep the area close to the area of the stock manifold you can't go far wrong. One way to alleviate all of *this* concern is to use a turbo charger. Of course that brings a whole new load of questions and considerations.... Tom Kendall