Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.163.168] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0.2)
  with HTTP id 1930682 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:00:18 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Engine Mounts
To: flyrotary
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0.2
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:00:18 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1930682@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <LPBBLNPNCNBNMPFHEHJEAEIFDEAA.haywire@telus.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Haywire" <haywire@telus.net>:

Hi Scott;
	I don't know if my method is "accepted", but I really like my engine mount.
I copied the basic idea from Mike Wills. It has not flown yet, but I'm
confident it will work fine. You can see it at
http://www3.telus.net/haywire/RV-9/13b_rotary_engine1.htm

S. Todd Bartrim
Turbo 13B rotary powered
RV-9endurance (FWF)
C-FSTB
http://www3.telus.net/haywire/RV-9/C-FSTB.htm

> Is there a major benefit to taking one mounting
> approach over another?