Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.163.168] (account ) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0.2) with HTTP id 1930693 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:58:51 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Engine Mounts To: flyrotary X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0.2 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:58:51 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <001801c2a716$9f56f330$0000a398@Carol> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "sqpilot@earthlink" : Hi, Scott....I looked at both type of mounts before ordering mine from Conversion Concepts. Paul Lamar likes Jerry Hey's mount. Tracy Crook likes Fred's (Conversion Concepts) mounts. The major difference that appealed to me, was that with the plate mount, you can remove and work on or replace your PSRU easily. Since Jerry Hey's mount is attached to the PSRU, I am of the opinion that it would be more difficult. I could be wrong. I was really impressed at the quality and workmanship from Conversion Concepts. I gave him my mounting points, thrust line, and firewall to prop flange dimensions, and just like magic, a motor mount arrived that fit my firewall hard points perfectly. I haven't seen an actual motor mount from Jerry Hey (only pictures), so I can't comment on the quality of Jerry's mounts, but I am told he is a good welder. I guess it is a matter of preference? Hope this helps. Paul Conner, Mobile, AL > Is there a major benefit to taking one mounting > approach over another?