Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.163.168] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0.2)
  with HTTP id 1930448 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:17:18 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Engine Mounts
To: flyrotary
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0.2
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:17:18 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1930448@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <20021219005924.98782.qmail@web13113.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Scott <squiggles@yahoo.com>:

Hello All...

Until a couple of days ago I thought the accepted
practice for engine mounting was to use a plate
sandwiched between the engine and the oil pan. 
However, then a posting a few days back referencing
Jerry Hey's mounts.  He would appear to use an end
housing mounting plate.

Is there a major benefit to taking one mounting
approach over another?

Thanx...

-Scott