Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:16:02 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r10.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.106] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 1930344 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:47:16 -0500 Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-r10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.34.321b2b31 (3932) for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:47:00 -0500 (EST) From: Lehanover@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <34.321b2b31.2b327104@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:47:00 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: intake manifold porting question X-Original-To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 > How much difference does a less than perfect port really > make? (I know, a hell of a question) kevin If it looks close, I would not add epoxy to anything. You would have to spend hours on the dyno searching for the last 8 HP. Then the port shape and match would be a big deal. With a turbo you will never know the difference. Lynn E. Hanover