Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:14:05 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web13105.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.174.150] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with SMTP id 1930347 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:36:18 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <20021219003617.50523.qmail@web13105.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.93.93.179] by web13105.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:36:17 PST X-Original-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:36:17 -0800 (PST) From: Scott Subject: Intakes X-Original-To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello All... After lurking on the list for a while I see most folks are using some combination of the lower intake manifold with custom fabricated runners. It seems everyone is using metal and not composites for the intakes. Are there a particular reasons for this? Like heat, vibration, etc.? I understand the dynamic supercharging idea, but what is causing this pulse(s) to come back through the intake? To utilize the dynamic supercharging effect on the intakes is there a particular length the intake runners should be? Is the amount of supercharging significantly effected by the diameter of the intake runners? Thanx... -Scott __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com