Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3122333 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:53:33 -0500 Received: from nc.rr.com (cpe-024-211-178-221.nc.rr.com [24.211.178.221]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i2Q4rWs1018268 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:53:32 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4063B2EB.2070607@nc.rr.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:34:51 -0500 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: cooling duct seal? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Charlie & Tupper England wrote: > If you are talking about sealing around a firewall penetration, you > might want to look at the fire-stop caulks available from any electrical > or communications supply house. Much higer heat resistance. Comes in a > standard caulk tube. > > Charlie Sounds reasonable. I'm assuming that the same "impregnate the fiberglass trick" will work? -- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ "Ignorance is mankinds normal state, alleviated by information and experience." Veeduber