From: "Mark McClure mark.mcclure.m3@gmail.com" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.214.178; envelope-from=mark.mcclure.m3@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: markmcclure@me.com
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 09:01:41 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKvELoo5ZKWOjn7k2K-t+_5mNt_BcTmnEBkh=J36DwjPyu7=Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Premix vs OMP
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <Flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f68fe905f59acd01"

--000000000000f68fe905f59acd01
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I now have 2 engine cores. One is set up for premix and one is set up for
OMP.  (I of course just purchased a set of SS braided OMP lines before
acquiring this 2nd engine)

My search of the listserv (2006-2010 results) shows that overall premix
yields a better distribution (at least for the RX-7 engines with 2 OMP
lines).

Is the general consensus still that premix is a better distribution? Still
recommending .7oz to 1 US Gal?

Thanks,
Mark

--000000000000f68fe905f59acd01
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I now have 2 engine cores. One is set up for premix a=
nd one is set up for OMP.=C2=A0 (I of course just purchased a set of SS bra=
ided OMP lines before acquiring this 2nd engine)<br></div><div><br></div><d=
iv>My search of the listserv (2006-2010 results) shows that overall premix =
yields a better distribution=C2=A0(at least for the RX-7 engines with 2 OMP=
 lines).=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Is the general consensus=C2=A0still=
 that premix is a better distribution? Still recommending .7oz to 1 US Gal?=
</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Mark</div><div><br></div><div><=
br></div></div>

--000000000000f68fe905f59acd01--