X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.23.0 (ClamAV engine v0.103.0) From: "Tracy rwstracy@gmail.com" Received: from mail-lf1-f53.google.com ([209.85.167.53] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.14) with ESMTPS id 1441234 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 15:19:37 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.167.53; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by mail-lf1-f53.google.com with SMTP id n138so85140485lfa.3 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:19:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bOohDh0a6up2AViT1uetSOXWjVVC0C85amvFN4ITFLc=; b=EmTuOJ1q/b94II5pViXuwC25RGvMcpH6MJzbqEktmmfAoRYUcFAmEzCEW9eI2CZcIn gwfDafVols+bk4AhVTTROyKC6sWKIj4K5nptZRKXvZunQvpiHfPdDXgSYQwdCTEn/P8C puwi5Ur80+skJ7xSNhhWJlecNW7koJR3aCWej7dDSY3wwqrVf6ePFbb9Ev612PnN4K/8 oyPRGdFwvZOzv+fx2onXrolAHrU4AzPvAvZnBijT2oTuqows4U9l+x5DnSz6Ta3d0KzJ +BAosTLht35uIBTKT8agET0AZ+SJE2PVkn8XWkD0Gc6o5JOwsLbWbQiBnf0sx3/SJhKF U+kA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=bOohDh0a6up2AViT1uetSOXWjVVC0C85amvFN4ITFLc=; b=L0rzeJ8NO8dibmmI8bB7H4yKtuYk4RMqwWCrATU2/tO9tQO5Ix7FfFTBQKdNw+T7r6 vtqjOn2sVJGbOgqJKtK7BnMed881ExbxafBw3xSWI/lLHH8ET/BNnLL4Ps00Awjh+/YO 0Jt2ySaR36fAj1k1xP/gSJfIf2zc19kDNdGa558JxSdZbRCHT5QGygNRH/zta8Vf3vTz vFgfXxrfU5nCDcRFTD6xaI2BTzWeC+xIAsZown+S4jSgRgsCmaHtW+7xjLwRsGEynbVc KOnzFjgupJ5peFBB5dLwE5YegP5IKgWfUMlxXrSH5jBmxlDV+9UdkCuiX0Fgr7Gs1kFf qZIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530INEQ+Yae/jS6xwfiZFSUaJbDpAo6jn08NafrZKRsB/VE3Vv1X en0IhYJi5Qr8tC24Pdp0hxdHjngveVPCAJR7Cz5Lf19ni2w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyByDy0bxMWCZDzGoZMRR0CGMBQ1gtFm5E7TiWh7DNy8kqLJoOtIWydpsR0ertKZLVvMn4/rLeSzNiuPrp/ZX8= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5091:: with SMTP id f17mr10022197lfm.352.1619378358858; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:19:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 15:19:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Temperature probe placement To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d6385e05c0d0e7fa" --000000000000d6385e05c0d0e7fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Did you try wrapping some insulation around the sensor & pipe to see if 'ambient cooling' is affecting the reading? On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 2:14 PM Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net < flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote: > I'm stumped. > > With my new coolant return plumbing (got rid of sharp 90 deg fitting) I > relocated my temp sensors. > > Return from left rad used to sit on (black) 45 deg fitting and return > from right rad on a 90 deg brass fitting. > > Now I have the right sensor under a silicone hose contacting the 3/4" > alum tubing out of the radiator. > > The left sensor contacting the 3/4" tubing going into the return (was > planning on moving it to left rad output tubing). > > The right probe now reads significantly lower (60F) than a non-contact > thermometer pointed at rad and also when pointed at silicone hose. > > All sensors read the same when cooled down overnight. > > I realize I could clamp the right probe to the silicone hose, but felt > that the hose would act as an insulator. > > Probes are LM35 or equivalent ICs. I had tested them in boiling water > and ice baths and they were accurate within 1 to 2 deg F. > > I feel I'm missing something. An alum tube is a good heat conductor, > right? Does its color matter when sensor is directly touching it (with > heat sink compound to ensure better contact)? > > I'd rather not go the route of inserting 3/4" copper tuning (with well > for sensor) into the return hoses, but perhaps the only way to get > accurate measurements? > > Finn > > > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > --000000000000d6385e05c0d0e7fa Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Did you try wrapping=C2=A0some insulation around the senso= r & pipe to see if 'ambient cooling' is affecting the reading?<= div>

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 2:14 PM Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:<= br>
I'm stumped.=

With my new coolant return plumbing (got rid of sharp 90 deg fitting) I relocated my temp sensors.

Return from left rad used to sit on (black) 45 deg fitting and return
from right rad on a 90 deg brass fitting.

Now I have the right sensor under a silicone hose contacting the 3/4" =
alum tubing out of the radiator.

The left sensor contacting the 3/4" tubing going into the return (was =
planning on moving it to left rad output tubing).

The right probe now reads significantly lower (60F) than a non-contact
thermometer pointed at rad and also when pointed at silicone hose.

All sensors read the same when cooled down overnight.

I realize I could clamp the right probe to the silicone hose, but felt
that the hose would act as an insulator.

Probes are LM35 or equivalent ICs. I had tested them in boiling water
and ice baths and they were accurate within 1 to 2 deg F.

I feel I'm missing something. An alum tube is a good heat conductor, right?=C2=A0 Does its color matter when sensor is directly touching it (wit= h
heat sink compound to ensure better contact)?

I'd rather not go the route of inserting 3/4" copper tuning (with = well
for sensor) into the return hoses, but perhaps the only way to get
accurate measurements?

Finn





---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
Homepage:=C2=A0 http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:=C2=A0 =C2=A0http://mail= .lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
--000000000000d6385e05c0d0e7fa--