Return-Path: Received: from mail.viclink.com ([66.129.220.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3112875 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:16:06 -0500 Received: from mail.viclink.com (p159.AS1.viclink.com [66.129.192.159]) by mail.viclink.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i2MGG2B10495 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:16:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <405F10BD.7080308@mail.viclink.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:13:49 -0800 From: Perry Mick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: C mounting on a B plate?? Renesis & RD-1C drivetesting References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.3(snapshot 20030217) (mail.viclink.com) Finn Lassen wrote: > Tracy Crook wrote: > >> The -C drive has very different internals but I will look at the >> feasibility of reworking the -B housing to receive the -C guts. I >> think it can be done. Yes, the -C bolts right up to the same >> adapter plate. I think you are right about the 2.85 becoming the >> preferred ratio, but only if you can handle the longer prop. > > > Sounds like Paul Lamar was right all along... > > I simply couldn't resist throwing that in here :) > > Finn > (cleaning out my inbox to make room for responses) > > That's what I thought too, but didn't have the guts to say it here. It may not help us pusher guys though, we can't handle large diameter props, possible prop strike on rotation. -- Perry Mick http://www.ductedfan.com