X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=EuKsUhUA c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=dSgDd1yB17SqwV0kVCKxMw==:117 a=dSgDd1yB17SqwV0kVCKxMw==:17 a=aGBzoAJ4ndkA:10 a=y4yBn9ojGxQA:10 a=DAwyPP_o2Byb1YXLmDAA:9 a=5kgCHx-JAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=hAJZgxq1hGT6QAn-dA4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=6HFbhAa02E-BoLbT:21 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=xHaYSeaRmFCljTX2gecA:9 a=HXjIzolwW10A:10 a=T6a71-JsGAwA:10 a=r8ZRCeaX8sBb4OpKaTiC:22 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 From: "Thomas Mann tmann@n200lz.com" Received: from mail.infosaic.com ([216.226.129.58] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.14) with ESMTPS id 695574 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 17:58:45 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.226.129.58; envelope-from=tmann@n200lz.com Received: by mail.infosaic.com via HTTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 18:04:13 -0400 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: re: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbos......... Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 18:04:13 -0400 Reply-To: tmann@n200lz.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary=b6284087700f4c8a9f906eeff9d6ea76 X-Originating-IP: [98.168.211.160] In-Reply-To: References: This is a multipart message in MIME format. --b6284087700f4c8a9f906eeff9d6ea76 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0e31f96bb2c44f028a5235129b41d172 --0e31f96bb2c44f028a5235129b41d172 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit .... and if you lost a rotor, you still have 200 hp at your disposal. ---------------------------------------- From: "Thomas Mann tmann@n200lz.com" Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 12:38 PM To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbos......... I considered a 13B with a turbo and compared that (Weight & HP) to a NA 20B. Pound for pound the was comparable for take-off and landing. .... but what I kept coming back to was 'Why did you select the Rotary in the first place?" The answer to that centered around the practically bullet proof simplicity of the design. Why would you go to a power plant that is truly simple in design only to complicate it with a Turbo? That's my logic path for selecting the 20B vs. a 13B-Turbo Either power plant will kick butt in a Long-EZ. T Mann --0e31f96bb2c44f028a5235129b41d172 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =
.... and if you lost a rotor, you still have 200 hp at your disposal.<= /div>
 
 
 

From: "Thomas Mann tmann@n200lz.com" <flyrotary@lancai= ronline.net>
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 12:38 PM
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironlin= e.net>
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbos.........
 
I considered a 13B with a turbo and compared that (Weight & HP) to= a NA 20B. 
=
Pound for pound the was comparable for take-off and landing. =
 
=
.... but what I kept coming back to was 'Why did you select the Rotary= in the first place?"
=
The answer to that centered around the practically bullet proof simpli= city of the design.
=
Why would you go to a power plant that is truly simple in design only = to complicate it with a Turbo?
=
 
=
That's my logic path for selecting the 20B vs. a 13B-Turbo =
Either power plant will kick butt in a Long-EZ.
=
 
=
T Mann
=
 
 
--0e31f96bb2c44f028a5235129b41d172-- --b6284087700f4c8a9f906eeff9d6ea76 Content-Type: image/png; name="221F435F53E049A19D53606B9AB3106F.png" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="221F435F53E049A19D53606B9AB3106F.png" Content-ID: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAhsAAAAFCAYAAADsZC5/AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1BAACx jwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAADsMAAA7DAcdvqGQAAAA7SURBVGhD7dYxEQAwCAAx/JuqgipADN26sMKW v4uHj3OzAAC2mA0AYJXZAABW/dkISZKkwdpsAADMy3phFq5FQ27V4wAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== --b6284087700f4c8a9f906eeff9d6ea76--