X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=RZTu9Glv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=PfljCweHXHZr3fS9hjJSJw==:117 a=pZ+9jw2XPLJ7kVxgYn3H2A==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=CKeqCrOqW6IA:10 a=sTwFKg_x9MkA:10 a=o1OHuDzbAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=pjdaNNIBAAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=_6GpL_ENAAAA:8 a=wScDTHzO1YSU8LE_SFgA:9 a=GKQ_A9BjGHpjX606:21 a=UyZDvAlAOAdT09KI:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Qa1je4BO31QA:10 a=gvSQh4r-fQ0A:10 a=5YQ6H4ZxyGn-KoBYtt8s:22 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 a=grOzbf7U_OpcSX4AJOnl:22 From: "Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com" Received: from mail-pf1-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.14) with ESMTPS id 290293 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 25 May 2020 20:55:57 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.171; envelope-from=stephen.izett@gmail.com Received: by mail-pf1-f171.google.com with SMTP id z64so4872149pfb.1 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 17:55:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=eEycH91KS6BbwcUQJwXEU2Yi7vv1n3fL1V6Uygp6B4w=; b=ReHHszBBXvZeEGfSK9ufkIlowNooFSaPUjN8ETfUojxafuXIczMWiieo1oMaqOtZ1Y qkf/5sTnZkUFB2+WDuktDKki8WoG+Qhp05DAEauI5eDd2yf7QqdEbATArwdVQxagpW9Z LHTgIuUjbV/tYuRCKE6JBWye6gL/uK0o7vUq+1SKKenzJYHv1AAq9a1tkLu4ZDm1i+F6 C5GhJMvGh6s5zAw3atMPt4AlnNpYVxLERYkQKlElP5iY46OWqjcBkafyPsL9GZdwJnEs MYwrzeanBQ6QS/x0H8kL61TVzKIxTvfpbKvRHSKDjiSTk4LHkUzqruR/TQdSgGnU2lsz 3akA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=eEycH91KS6BbwcUQJwXEU2Yi7vv1n3fL1V6Uygp6B4w=; b=RjYWG8hhX7Xa0SYb0Wir/EuzMsvBindLKNrNZD/wxNvfbMX7LNBC2JWTYPeQituxK+ QwvBPXzqnITD7XojvMq5i5BIiDSwl7tvgdAQ3//MUPwxkDskzQVImAOOwD1owdcqyq5z F2FXQuh9gImG6gsf2r52QWrPO8JqoUvAElftso3LqupoI46uOu+JMD+HbRbRrxHnVrWN 6eTboadaD/vaXB+0bY6ZxwEEGqAs773m34S15BDCg5Fg2R3B0oT4BNlyac0UwNI3pRpi zo+d0m2tiWndsJxFalUGhzmquwpJ31vrR6kudIoOtrNtxhUgE5BcqOty1gAvPmPiYG1Q H82w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532M63IQmdVO9XNE+Em6PT/A98yK5QmnS/2pFPgLcP5ImlU7k2yw tXyJvU3wArpo6wKy9tGaiIjQOeKueQo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvGHVPeGvxp3uql86JqqitThoQ0S1aLmedWfdpko3lVdjjsoqN8FOSF7EKSjUEvR+/kbPoeA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e50f:: with SMTP id r15mr15390681pgh.192.1590454540154; Mon, 25 May 2020 17:55:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from macbook-pro.lan (203-59-74-185.perm.iinet.net.au. [203.59.74.185]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m188sm14220286pfd.67.2020.05.25.17.55.38 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 May 2020 17:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: First engine run -- prop or not? Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 08:55:35 +0800 References: To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <84F36C64-64E1-43D1-9259-1CEC8F4DBE40@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) I=E2=80=99ll be really keen to hear how the engine runs when you=E2=80=99v= e had a chance to settle the initial tune. I=E2=80=99m interested because my reprogram of the EC3 chips yielded a = spluttering backfiring mess! Does a Harley sound like a spluttering backfiring mess? Its as if the timing of the ignition was all out. I thought between us = we had the software fuses right, but wondered if some debug stuff was = messing things up. In the mean time I=E2=80=99m using my EC2 which I did reprogram years = ago myself and is all good. Steve > On 26 May 2020, at 8:47 am, Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net = wrote: >=20 > Thanks Steve, makes sense now. >=20 > Finn >=20 > On 5/25/2020 6:50 PM, Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi Finn >>=20 >> Its about the differential pressure across the injector when its = switched on. >> If the fuel rail stayed constant pressure, but the pressure in the = manifold/port varies, as it does with throttle position&rpm, the fuel = flow will vary (not good). >> With the regulator tracking manifold pressure then the injectors = always pass the same amount of fuel per time open. >>=20 >> Steve Izett >>=20 >>=20 >>> On 26 May 2020, at 6:44 am, Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net = wrote: >>>=20 >>> I wish I knew what type my sensors are. I'm assuming absolute, but = is there a way to tell? >>> https://www.ebay.com/itm/272759060859 >>> Using the 80 psi one for fuel. >>>=20 >>> Yes, MAP port on fuel regulator connected to MAP sensors in EC3 and = then to intake plenum after throttle body. >>>=20 >>> So, lower MAP =3D more air? >>> More air, more fuel, higher fuel pressure? >>>=20 >>> Seems I got the opposite from the brief log run. >>>=20 >>> But the EC3 changes fuel flow based on MAP, so don't quite = understand the need for varying the fuel pressure. >>>=20 >>> Bear with me, I'm new to EFI. >>>=20 >>> Finn >>>=20 >>> On 5/25/2020 4:38 PM, Charlie England ceengland7@gmail.com wrote: >>>> If the regulator has a MAP port and it's connected to the intake, = then fuel pressure should vary with MAP. That's supposed to keep fuel = flow proportional to airflow. But MAP is absolute; fuel pressure = measurement will depend on the type of sensor (relative to atmospheric, = or absolute). >>>>=20 >>>> I wouldn't attach any significance to bubbles in the return line; = the regulator is venting (spitting) fuel through what can be a tiny = slit, into the relatively free air of the return line. >>>>=20 >>>> Charlie >>>>=20 >>>> On 5/25/2020 2:57 PM, Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net wrote: >>>>> Don't have the wings on. Ran from a 6 gallon jug next to the = fuselage. Can use a transparent line for the fuel return to inspect for = bubbles. >>>>>=20 >>>>> How is the fuel pressure regulator supposed to work? Looks like = the fuel pressure dropped a bit as MAP dropped. Is that the way it's = supposed to work? >>>>>=20 >>>>> Finn >>>>>=20 >>>>> On 5/25/2020 8:59 AM, Charlie England ceengland7@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 10:34 PM Finn Lassen = finn.lassen@verizon.net wrote: >>>>>> Good point. =46rom the log I think it was running lean. I'm = temporarily using a narrow band O2 sensor. I think I'll hook a = multimeter directly to it to bypass any errors from sensor to EC3 and = EC3 to EM3 and its display. And I have to read the EC3 manual :) >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Those o-rings were a bad idea. If I'd had a mill and could have = milled recesses to retain them from expanding out under pressure they = might work. But an o-ring between two flat surfaces is probably bad = design. If sucking air, won't I see that in the return line as bubbles? >>>>>> You won't if you use proper fuel line. ;-) The big issue is loss = of power if it starts sucking air at a critical time. I've got a couple = of friends who fly big-Continental powered Globe Swifts. They've both = had forced landings (one of them multiple times) before they found that = the ancient flex lines feeding the fuel pump had dried out and were = porous to air but not fuel. Never leaked fuel, but would intermittently = suck air and cause engine stoppage. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Charlie >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Finn >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On 5/24/2020 10:56 PM, Charlie England ceengland7@gmail.com = wrote: >>>>>>> Congrats on 1st run. Doubt that the issue is no prop; they idle = ok in the car without one. ;-) >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Don't neglect the input side; those pumps will suck air even = better than fuel. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Charlie >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On 5/24/2020 9:01 PM, Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net wrote: >>>>>>>> Probably too early to give you that. (Used 8.10 and PICkit2). >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Ran for the first time today (no prop). >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Over speeding not an issue. Ran like a Harley :( >>>>>>>> No sure if because no prop or because not tuned yet or if = something else wrong. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Zero RPM readout on EM3. I must have misunderstood the = instructions or the program. I thought the EM3 got RPM from the EC3, so = I didn't wire the tach input to the EM3. >>>>>>>> EM3 shows "NOP" until EC3 is turned on. Then shows "0". >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Only did a couple of runs. Fuel pumps started leaking badly = around O-rings when I adjusted fuel pressure up to 37psi (engine not = running). Pooled up in fuselage. Need to fix before I try running again. = Gas is cheap, but not that cheap. I'll try copper washers on the = pressure (output) side instead of the o-rings. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Yes, I know, not pretty. Threaded the output fitting at an = angle :( >>>>>>>> Too lazy to redo the output block. >>>>>>>> I also need to bend a new input tube without a kink. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Max oil pressure only about 50 psi, hopefully because of low = RPM. >>>>>>>> Forgot to turn on master switch so alternator didn't come = on-line. >>>>>>>> Didn't log the run where that worked. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Anyhow, can now say I've run the engine :) >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Finn >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> On 5/22/2020 6:12 AM, Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com = wrote: >>>>>>>>> Great work Finn >>>>>>>>> Could I get the MPLABs version your using and any more info = for the build. >>>>>>>>> I could build and program and confirm the burn but the EC3 ran = like a dog. >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On 22 May 2020, at 9:16 am, Finn Lassen = finn.lassen@verizon.net >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Well, after several hours of Murphy working overtime, I = finally was able to get the wiring on my EC3 chip programming board = right, chips programmed and EC3 installed. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Flux capacitor fluxing, injectors clicking and spark plug = firing. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Time to get the wheels on and roll it out and start the = engine. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Oh, wait, guess I need to finish and install the prop :( >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Finn >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On 5/21/2020 9:23 AM, Finn Lassen >>>>>>>>>> finn.lassen@verizon.net >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> 1) Without prop any vibration will be from engine and PSRU = and can inspect engine (leaks, etc.) with no fear of prop. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> 2) With prop less chance of over rev and some cooling air = through rads and oil cooler. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Finn >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> --=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Homepage: >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Archive and UnSub: >>>>>>>>>>> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Homepage: >>>>>>>>>> http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Archive and UnSub: >>>>>>>>>> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Homepage: >>>>>>>>> http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> Archive and UnSub: >>>>>>>>> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Homepage: >>>>>>>> http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Archive and UnSub: >>>>>>>> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Virus-free. www.avast.com >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >>=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html