X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=No+TSIVJ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=35fRrQoEY1G+LqlcuDZ0yg==:117 a=3JhidrIBZZsA:10 a=3p-tDj2tIPRjURcj1JkA:9 a=UMMQN3CH32ROKgFa:21 a=EoC69ORZ6IXDGkOW:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=wlRuZ6f9MUUU-ScRKgMA:9 a=TNw3JNewCPjsmLs6:21 From: "Andrew Martin andrew@martinag.com.au" Received: from mail-qt1-f178.google.com ([209.85.160.178] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.10) with ESMTPS id 12062381 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 23:20:05 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.160.178; envelope-from=andrew@martinag.com.au Received: by mail-qt1-f178.google.com with SMTP id r14so35801349qtp.1 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 20:20:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=martinag-com-au.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zraDMgOEhzCppRl3qX1apAypti4ugDLC9dasDG8l7Vw=; b=bGQGCd9LxWI24JqaIMShNZ/mTMKPJ28Is+W9qnbJlt2P/A8mAN/qBraYaDUu827SFC DN/RfQi0pLGfeKtqn4jWgk62p1W3fsVJ/s8i0KrSNx60uPYYqZyeGVAhlvYtionoIWDq F/NQVVRBpG6cfcYcdQNqekJpUalfuUQvMPxRohtl/u1zlTnFtZZq3d/oIsp7PXycl2Ee pbZvQCGYgXR3JjRI/wIygVNfMfAsRmhVEISC9nt7QfI05NnLUmIsuO4yifCkO46h8dP7 ptlcpYwfiYIBku1tlI5dDZtb17tj8h7VHADNdtoN+KGfkje3s//tiIUy5UrALBzB39bB sNag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zraDMgOEhzCppRl3qX1apAypti4ugDLC9dasDG8l7Vw=; b=A/bVdbxENQzlspHwTJrmeBSgP+iIDtcZA3aJtstqVsnd16CduZV/PFlsHGmCrIm8k7 sUzZ9AhZQfY38Dwau3EtiCnXUGYYUsS6znXVqTB/RJdc5UkUWpXiBJxSxddlvb86uC8e vjEqNMpJXOgOiItz/h6PlQYjtoixbSHtBgrUd/m6UfCoYlj1NzNwM6Ngtb1vRW2MLsun P3qeJIRAo5skt9f7zbd75FCCk+v04skc6N4krY6yVvvF30SQcWiX6fJjJCct+x4YqTaS jsFR5hKcHdHMXFuGgTTlHxPswznDUCodZj36Uk4qG9KDiYIFLTMF/mr3nsRsZJ2FU5iw o+Xg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWagXf2tslCoJWe3FpRduuEqD6E+v7v+lfhRpFvt8eLYKBQbRBps nyO0WgFNX6j/B50x1b3lBVKers2mH5Q4nx9nH3FA3wM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5kevySUZsaPsEJlE7tBJDcap9dHGHvyZK+rZwwxcHzionXg8JvbeoUKmYjP7zJsWim3L+r/JzxUJhLI2ur0pw= X-Received: by 2002:aed:2702:: with SMTP id n2mr43818941qtd.216.1546489188312; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 20:19:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 12:19:36 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Saga continues To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b7fbc4057e86122f" --000000000000b7fbc4057e86122f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Really think I=E2=80=99m starting to win. But very slowly, which is frustra= ting. Seems my initial overheating issues were a combination of many things, not each that bad in installation but added together!!!! and each masks the others. Mocal oil cooler definately works, and judicious application of duct tape over all the now unnecessary holes in the cowl to improve airflow seems to have done the job, and can now be done proper again with grp. But. Seems my oil filter is next on the list to address. I used the stock mazda renesis oil filter. It actually looks too small to use ( which I now believe it is) but I stuck with it because I assumed mazda did the calculations ( No, the accountants probably took over). Mazda=E2=80=99s fil= ter setup only filters oil going to the oil galleries, most oil is not filtered and just returns to sump via the OCV. Since fitting new oil cooler I now also have 2 temp sensors, both after the oil cooler but original 1 is also after the filter. Both are on rear iron. On latest flight, oil going to OCV max=E2=80=99d at 176f while filtered oi= l going to oil gallery/rotors kept climbing to 216f where I aborted the climb. Couldve kept going as temp started to behave as I reduced climb, but I really want to fix these little nuances that restrict performance. Maybe something unknown is affecting the sensor, otherwise it has to be the filter. So, 2 choices, either a better filter that just filters gallery/rotor oil, or a remote filter that filters all oil. If using remote filters, what size/part number do you use? Has anyone measured presure drop/ restriction through filters? Andrew --000000000000b7fbc4057e86122f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Really think I=E2=80=99m starting to win. But very s= lowly, which is frustrating. Seems my initial overheating issues were a com= bination of many things, not each that bad in installation but added togeth= er!!!! and each masks the others.

Mocal oil cooler definately works, and judicious application of d= uct tape over all the now unnecessary holes in the cowl to improve airflow = seems to have done the job, and can now be done proper again with grp.

But. Seems my oil filter is = next on the list to address. I used the stock mazda renesis oil filter. It = actually looks too small to use ( which I now believe it is) =C2=A0but I st= uck with it because I assumed mazda did the calculations ( No, the accounta= nts probably took over). Mazda=E2=80=99s filter setup only filters oil goin= g to the oil galleries, most oil is not filtered and just returns to sump v= ia the OCV. Since fitting new oil cooler I now also have 2 temp sensors, bo= th after the oil cooler but original 1 is also after the filter. Both are o= n rear iron.

On latest f= light, oil going to OCV max=E2=80=99d at 176f =C2=A0while filtered oil goin= g to oil gallery/rotors kept climbing to 216f where I aborted the climb. Co= uldve kept going as temp started to behave as I reduced climb, but I really= want to fix these little nuances that restrict performance. Maybe somethin= g unknown is affecting the sensor, otherwise it has to be the filter.
=

So, 2 choices, either a bette= r filter that just filters gallery/rotor oil, or a remote filter that filte= rs all oil.=C2=A0
If using remote filters, what size= /part number do you use? Has anyone measured presure drop/ restriction thro= ugh filters?

Andrew


=


--000000000000b7fbc4057e86122f--