X-Junk-Score:   0 []
X-Cloudmark-Score:   0 []
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=as3wMmRV c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=UUw1RyDqGKisiOPICcNNcg==:117 a=b0WXXb1TpCRXX/ruI2YXbQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=CKeqCrOqW6IA:10 a=ocR9PWop10UA:10 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=HZrnLLNjnAdip6knQ94A:9 a=uBpZAkiKvZhyD6Xm:21 a=UpA-_bNCTVJ49kIZ:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Qa1je4BO31QA:10 a=gvSQh4r-fQ0A:10 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 a=grOzbf7U_OpcSX4AJOnl:22
From: "Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.1)
  with ESMTPS id 10493201 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:44:50 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.192.170; envelope-from=stephen.izett@gmail.com
Received: by mail-pf0-f170.google.com with SMTP id p84so22693497pfd.3
        for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 17:44:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references
         :to:in-reply-to:message-id;
        bh=k8AKYmZD4944vPEWQa6sFTeDOTdy2hqFY3shMeuKSpE=;
        b=K13fDptKiitytVr74AUGo+wYSQT6cmjMjom0Vmnrtfn0Xnl8OeDu2t97dfGx/hUCwO
         2WJAoJQ1wzjIc9GhetZj/fRs7HBdzS8OTN8KFuOmRyeppzk3v+87UTLCThlrjtDXAuSk
         GS9qUYpXleu8vgVm710KK05BBDWdfLRoQ+UX+ouPMJBgxfkK8nXqrg48M3O/JNnAxRyf
         W+LNyeVVmCNC2kYO/V53JrhGv8NgPVyLowkXnU+oUI+ATbsBfHpVVrva4zNEveNK+QSc
         xwIBinw35UiqzgSmk7XedBiorXJ/zAI7TNxJTvwjmMgAQ7MxrG+B9qMYtWZ0bnWyBYNi
         3P9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
         :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id;
        bh=k8AKYmZD4944vPEWQa6sFTeDOTdy2hqFY3shMeuKSpE=;
        b=g8nIvHvK7n87c6T29j0GMjYz9BWHaqwh7p3bHLbnqB0icdG4PboFeA+MJ+yu9ekqz6
         ZKnPc5rsYHYy18sDkuxmswYxnc0jZtK5ZxrJj2c9HgiyEZfdOBoLKy0+UUgCkk32aWKg
         tiRmWiQxPxqYodK3H+wD/t61YzIGDYIqDs4OcAS8ceMMK7IYtaRpHmR0ELjKJ3Is1VVC
         q5y1deML/ag/DrE/wDmhpj+rWohF2qU0f5aoLmfEERrQxGC5uJ3mYrU2bYJqufRt+Q4K
         YXQSUpiqBrqUH0mxCzu4axkH6M+yC3/IjK4m0cnIYu70Grp5pRH3ML0doKjJdSe4m8bK
         SRAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLaXmT/p/+yGGdwO9EDVX9uNjtt49lW9YdNfw6ZHTXOFpFgtHhy
	dZBNUof9VV3r+LMNp84ytEmQZC0F
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovekDQsURbZt5C78bJ95dzYtC+XzZ9npLa4XvMqwJo052vR4Nu/HTCx4D5PZB7BD+D8RULpRg==
X-Received: by 10.98.195.26 with SMTP id v26mr10531648pfg.209.1514598273230;
        Fri, 29 Dec 2017 17:44:33 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <stephen.izett@gmail.com>
Received: from [10.1.1.29] (220-253-221-100.dyn.iinet.net.au. [220.253.221.100])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j17sm63897705pgv.40.2017.12.29.17.44.31
        for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Fri, 29 Dec 2017 17:44:32 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling Issues
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:44:26 +0800
References: <list-10492771@logan.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-10492771@logan.com>
Message-Id: <9F2CAA32-52B1-43C8-8A4D-8AE9562B74F6@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)

Hi Steve

I took a moment and estimated the total duct scaled from the drawing as =
being about 18.5 in^2 (Prop Flange is I think 6 in)
Then I have taken away 2 in^2 for feeding the coils/alternator.
It=E2=80=99s that 2 in^2 I=E2=80=99ll redeem for water cooling and move =
the coiling air for the coils/alternator.
I just realised to that I should probably be feeding the coils and =
alternator from diffused (slowed) air and not from free stream air.

I=E2=80=99ve always measured from the inside minimum neck of the entry =
and not included the lips. What is the convention?
You appear to have measured from the outside of the flange which I =
measure to be about 27 inch^2.

I=E2=80=99ve wondered how effective the inlet area right against the =
prop spinner will be at cruise.=20

Steve
> On 30 Dec 2017, at 4:56 am, Steven W. Boese SBoese@uwyo.edu =
<flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
>=20
> Steve,
>=20
> The attached plot shows the interaction between coolant and oil =
temperatures obtained on my test stand.  The oil cooler and the radiator =
are fed air from separate ducts and their outlet areas are independently =
variable.  RPM was 4000 and HP was 42 during the test.  Water T is the =
temperature of the coolant coming out of the engine and Oil T is oil =
temperature returning to the engine from the oil cooler.  With those =
temperatures stabilized at about 210 deg, the air delta P was 2.6 inches =
of water across the radiator and the oil cooler cores.
>=20
> After the air flow through the oil cooler was increased while leaving =
the radiator air flow unchanged, the Oil T dropped from 212 to 160 deg =
while the Water T dropped from 212 to 200 deg.  At this time, the oil =
cooler oil delta T was 33 deg  and the radiator water delta T was 15 =
deg.
>=20
> My conclusion from this is that it will be difficult to cause a =
significant change in the coolant operating temperature by making =
changes to the oil cooling part of the system.  In real life, I was a =
scientist.  It may be useful to run this conclusion past an engineer.  =
Scientists just collect data while engineers figure out what the data =
means and how make use of it.
>=20
> =46rom the photo of the front of the radiator inlet duct, comparing =
the inlet to the prop flange, it would appear that the duct inlet has an =
area of around 27 sq in.  Your previous information indicates an inlet =
area of 16.5 sq in which may be the area of the inlet through the cowl.  =
What sort of interface do you have between the cowl and duct?
>=20
> Steve Boese
> RV6A, 1986 13B NA, RD1A, EC2
>=20
> From: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> on =
behalf of Stephen Izett =
stephen.izett@gmail.com<flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 12:42:29 AM
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling Issues
> =20
> Hi Lynn
> Current testing is stationary.
>=20
> I have had it on the apron doing figure 8=E2=80=99s and it seemed to =
not overheat.=20
> Still to hot though.
>=20
> Once its moving it seems to help with airflow.
>=20
> I=E2=80=99m not going to give up on our setup just yet.
> I=E2=80=99ve got a few ideas and a bunch of testing and then maybe fly =
it and see what it does with some wind in its face.
>=20
> What delta T=E2=80=99s should I expect from the oiling water coolers?
> Sounds like 15F on the water and a fair bit more on the oil?
>=20
> Cheers
>=20
> Steve Izett
> <oil and coolant temperature interaction.jpg>--
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html