Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 09:29:26 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.49] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3065804 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 22:08:20 -0500 Received: from user-2injpbl.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.121.229.117] helo=Carol) by scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AzSAk-0000Wy-00 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:08:19 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <000701c40328$3abbd520$0000a398@Carol> From: "sqpilot@earthlink" X-Original-To: "flyrotary" Subject: It runs better X-Original-Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 21:07:56 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 Well, after re-reading the MicroTech ECU manual, it appears that I had one injector wired to the primary and the other to the secondary system. I suspect that to have been the problem, because when I re-wired the "incorrect" injector, the engine started immediately, and had more RPM at the same throttle setting than it did previously (wired as one primary and one secondary). Also, on shut-down, both throttlebody holes just leaked a couple of drops of fuel. (At least they were equal) . Since I have no secondary injectors, those wires were not supposed to be used. I don't know exactly how the primaries and secodaries are different, but it seems evident that they are. Thanks to all who contributed to my success in getting this thing to make noise. Paul Conner