|
David,
I think you finally succeeded in getting Tracy to recognize there are
pressurized reservoir systems out there. I have a new BMW tank with an indicator
built in. Decided to stay with my smaller Volvo tank. If anyone wishes to buy
it, it is available for about 50% of retail, I.e. $50.
Bernie Kerr 772 466 6701
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 1:40
AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ideal Cooling
System Plumbing (wasRe:[FlyRotary]Re:overflow
OK David, I see what you mean. This could give an indication of
trouble in some circumstances. Although you would need to fully
characterize the system. Changing the pressurized reservoir size,
coolant level when filled, temperature when filled, etc, would all affect the
results.
Tracy
----- Original Message -----
From:
David Carter
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 4:31
PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ideal Cooling
System Plumbing(wasRe:[FlyRotary]Re:overflow
I have a feeling that we are talking about two different
"coolant level sensors". The one I'm talking about is in the
"pressurized coolant/expansion/header tank" like a late 90's Ford
Taurus. The point that must be noted to discuss this "logically" is
that the coolant level in this tank ("FULL - HOT") is ABOVE the top of
the high spot for coolant in the engine. And, there is air space
above the FULL- HOT level. There is not other expansion
tank. Coolant doesn't go "somewhere else". That is
as high as the level gets (unless there is blowby which is discussed
last below.) But, to discuss LEAKS, not BLOWBY/STEAM:
This
being the case, if the coolant level in this tank goes down and
the "low" sensor activates, there is still coolant in the engine block
(unless the coolant tank is very deep, where bottom is WAY below the top
of engine - not the case on the Ford). If this is so, then how
could the "coolant low" light NOT be a good indicator that you have a
leak? - None of the coolant is being "expanded"
into an unpressurized "expansion tank". That unpressurized tank is
REPLACED by this "pressurized coolant/expansion/header tank".
Coolant does not "expand" "OUT" of this tank. It is THE expansion
tank. - I think we are mixing the two systems in this
discussion. This "pressurized coolant/exp/hdr tank" is part
of the CLOSED system - it is not "external" to the cooling system.
It is PART OF THE SYSTEM - and if its level goes down, then the entire
closed system is losing coolant - the SYSTEM has a
leak. - When the sensor in this tank turns
on the "low" or "check coolant" light, then you have a leak - and you
know it immediately upon losing about 1/2 or 1 qt (whatever is in
this tank between "Full - Hot" and the "low sensor".
Yes we should
know the pressure indications of problems - but I don't think we have
anyone flying with a tank with a fluid level indication system. Thus,
there will be no "real stories" to validate this proposed Ideal Cooling
System. (ref someone else's post asking for "proof").
And, yes, if
there is blowby as mentioned earlier (compression/combustion gasses
leaking by bad seals into the cooling passages and forcing HIGH pressure
into the coolant galleys) then, because this high pressure is greater
than the cap's release pressure, this blowby WILL force liquid past the
cap and out wherever you have it plumbed to go.
- I would simply route the rubber line from that "cap pressure
release overflow fitting" to go up and spray up beside the windscreen
where I could see it - to warn me that I was either suffering compression
blowby - either from bad seals or from overheating and steaming. In
either case, I'd have instant warning that I need to terminate the flight
ASAP. - It would be an desireable increase in
parts count and would MASK the problem to vent the "pressure cap blowby"
into some other "expansion tank" that you couldn't see or might not
immediately notice.
In summary, in the absence of "high pressure
above cap release pressure" in this CLOSED system, a fluid level
indicator system should give you an early, positive, and adequate warning
that you have a leak, whether you notice the pressure "clues" or
not.
David
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tracy
Crook" <lors01@msn.com> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft"
<flyrotary@lancaironline.net> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 10:33
AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ideal Cooling System
Plumbing (wasRe:[FlyRotary]Re:overflow
> FIRST
the pressure drops precipitously, and THEN the coolant level > starts
to go down ... FINALLY the temps start to rise (provided the > temp
sender is submerged in what water remains).
Just a brief comment
on this part. Coolant level sensors are of almost no use in this
application. It is commonly assumed that the temp gauge reads low
as soon as the sensor is no longer submerged. Not true. It only
drops after the coolant is all boiled away because steam will heat the
sensor. If you haven't caught the problem long before this, it's
too late anyway.
Tracy
>> Homepage:
http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive:
http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|
|