X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "durabol35@yahoo.com" Received: from sonic329-26.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com ([74.6.133.152] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2c1) with ESMTP id 9502859 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:19:57 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.6.133.152; envelope-from=durabol35@yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1487981962; bh=i91Wmy31q6T0GJVA9YStHdR5quMYY1jnfbHE2rhqrnQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=m+tmwNXLLwrt8zM/Tu46XfEfJw1nGIU2KZMde/7gMIAQFU7Sh+ZSyrmfHlfsLzeYBtJjWQZ0YaYs6accjlZG1GwTrU5cxKSivMDAB3SJVeuYqZLNl6K67/Y7OSUo1x7GrpKSx29dBxiok/f5uF0/0oueKddh7KbOaPKFsGDiRgIFPZ1wayicDCyPfEdF/JwH5HZk+o65PvCpbGqE2/YV3l0FBkIs6L/kLm5FnBojHUBL6Vc0sH60t4eygPJ0NH7RHT+AqJuRbNM1HSrvhbB3a4EjGhqhmFBbBa1WqIzkyi2Q0X7gPDg8g5PaJlFsCmFJuL9ErvvZct6CbtQbp7O8/Q== X-YMail-OSG: FEKWXp8VM1nI0IJ3Z7vgMas.rljJocryvWZy0TYn3U9aUnb15r07Xg2etqetpRw PdkhoHtYYCcIuPDm7EvRjHzUd98wa613yfV9HjNlP8WtASDLMSkN_WhgaZuAFWlSKWhlCEL_gv7j DhJBu56ILwL9glDM5W9n0CLQE5ZuIyQB7DUQKBKr0lSN.AwYS6zfwW7UYM7OYbgGsTfi_E58spK7 IrCIZBbSxkrtQFNI9hDwjBOJKvJkJ5LnMgE7E3rrc4Jhs2SlbQB.gX5yN_FNTybHg0d_qmYjjBmx wLUjWZ12lPaBnIqEvgCvBGjQyzWSMIp.HDKbPf8jAQ86OLD.rrp3bBoRldhJHGQTTFD.5W8Q7z8d DqPr1qYvqH0l6R4P3aw5PT9MLM_Z.hsBRNBczrOsv1hiBsJiZ0SjtUpAWkW0EmgbFmLHR8i00RsA 5tr4MUyJitLUawikLA9ijqsux5Yj8x8qQKIfS2bLPVFmcjPeiwZPPwTAyNxaJMduVQPO.3b73wZ3 JqYWi0E7Rugl6WgQ2rd1EnsCdT6Z6jaF_ Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic329.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 00:19:22 +0000 Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 00:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Reply-To: "durabol35@yahoo.com" To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: <769222174.723618.1487981876741@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Boost Port Carb Efficiency MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_723617_396747311.1487981876740" Content-Length: 3021 ------=_Part_723617_396747311.1487981876740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm sorry I don't know why the formatting of my email was wonky. I wasn't planning a tuned intake mainly because I don't need a lot of power =C2=A0(100hp for 1200lbs gross). I'm planning to have a red-line around 400= 0rpm/120hp =C2=A0with around 3300rpm/100hp static. One of the reasons for the low rpm = is to keep =C2=A0the motorcycle chains happier. Okay I now understand it is better to have a backup controller as opposed t= o two =C2=A0different controllers for each rotor. I suppose it would be pretty un= likely that =C2=A0one rotor would ever need to be shut down and if I have multiple thro= ttles I =C2=A0could just throttle it back. Okay I'll go with peripheral porting and not do some experimenting and "rei= nvent" =C2=A0the wheel. :) Brock ------=_Part_723617_396747311.1487981876740 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm sorry I don't know why the formatting o= f my email was wonky.

I wasn't planning a tuned intake mainly because I don't n= eed a lot of power
 (100hp for 1200lbs gross). I'm p= lanning to have a red-line around 4000rpm/120hp
 with around 3300rpm/100hp static. One of the reasons f= or the low rpm is to keep
 t= he motorcycle chains happier.

Okay I now understand it is better to have a back= up controller as opposed to two
&= nbsp;different controllers for each rotor. I suppose it would be pretty unl= ikely that
 one rotor would = ever need to be shut down and if I have multiple throttles I
 could just throttle it back.

Okay I'll go wit= h peripheral porting and not do some experimenting and "reinvent"
 the wheel. :)

<= /div>
Brock

------=_Part_723617_396747311.1487981876740--