X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "Christian And Tamara Mcdonald" Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.8) with ESMTPS id 8308450 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 02:18:14 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.223.176; envelope-from=christamarmc@gmail.com Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id g73so45241396ioe.3 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:18:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BF/6vqFZyWI5GGgRy74GxBRyGV7NWjgReCQ0cDJhQ4w=; b=x6P9NkmokHNaigJufogsIK4daaBSNZDeRwInaSDs/NlbQxSvbqXW/D9jLM/uyZp7hV DQyQrbtjf+1/wt0BA6L8Yp40BuXkAz85aHO7penBp6+5ohGuX5jx3YOyk8RrKfv1+Skh wnaX3OFUGbbpH9VWFvZpb0Vh2dqA6vKAKITkwyqBpSAkiuZP5sumRmVjzOFfoJ68Jbiu KmVrQmfY/aeewZwjquCgx+A+XHBcnsCSueF3bDlXSBl++/s2M022kqD1XtQd0P1jOVjo QIT+YAQd4l4KytZSFl8E63b67H8tF/0BSyBcHtT7bIwSzgVRZ/ayZdp/x+f1/FPBxvI4 m0zA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.13.4 with SMTP id 4mr74783763ion.124.1452151076886; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:17:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.16.16 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:17:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:17:56 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Insurance To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1149433e1920490528b945e6 --001a1149433e1920490528b945e6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Andrew I used to be with qbe and they had no issues with the rotary, not sure why they wouldn't now Cheers Christian rv7 On Thursday, January 7, 2016, Andrew Martin wrote: > What's the go getting insurance in Australia? Neil Unger and Steve Izett, > have you found rotary friendly insurers? My broker is struggling to find a > company to even negotiate with, apparently because of the engine, even > though the plane has been built under the SAAA builder assist program. QBE > who are supposed to be the SAAA insurers for Experimental aircraft seem to > be the worst to deal with. > > I'm ready for my CoA, so probably going to self insure for hull, may still > be able to get liability and pilot cover, to protect my other assets in > case the insurers are correct in their assumption of my ability (or lack > of) to construct and pilot a safe aircraft. > > Andrew > > > > --001a1149433e1920490528b945e6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andrew

I used to be with qbe and they had no issues w= ith the rotary, not sure why they wouldn't now

Cheers
Christian rv7

On Thursday, January 7, 2016, Andrew= Martin <flyrotary@lancai= ronline.net> wrote:
What's the go getting insurance in Australia? Neil Unger and St= eve Izett, have you found rotary friendly insurers?=C2=A0 My broker is stru= ggling to find a company to even negotiate with, apparently because of the = engine, even though the plane has been built under the SAAA builder assist = program. QBE who are supposed to be the SAAA insurers for Experimental airc= raft seem to be the worst to deal with.

I'm ready for my = CoA, so probably going to self insure for hull, may still be able to get li= ability and pilot cover, to protect my other assets in case the insurers ar= e correct in their assumption of my ability (or lack of) to construct and p= ilot a safe aircraft.

Andrew


--001a1149433e1920490528b945e6--