Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #61852
From: Bill Bradburry <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Return to Flight - 2
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 22:05:25 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Steve,

 

Real data!  So you have the ability to dyno your engine, so to speak.  Have you done this and can you share your results.  I am really curious about how the Renesis acts with a turbo on it.  I would also really like to see some pics of your turbo setup.  Are you using an intercooler, where are you picking up your turbo oil and where are you bringing the oil drain into the crankcase?  Are you using the stock Renesis exhaust or did you build one special to fit the turbo?

Do you now or plan to install this engine in your plane?

 

Would that load cell idea work in the plane as you are flying or would the turbulence make it go haywire?

 

Bill

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 5:10 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Return to Flight - 2

 

Bill,

 

HP was calculated from torque and RPM.  Torque was measured using a load cell connected between the engine and mounting frame.  The cell was calibrated by applying a pure torque to the PSRU-engine assembly.

 

Steve 



------ Original Message ------
From : Bill Bradburry
Subject : [FlyRotary] Re: Return to Flight - 2

Steve,

 

How do you know that you were producing 174 HP?

 

Bill

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 11:29 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Return to Flight - 2

 

Bill,

 

At 6000 RPM, HP was 174 and MAP was 37" Hg.

 

The radiator for the test stand is larger than what would be needed in an aircraft.  It is capable of maintaining a 200 degree coolant out of the engine at the above power setting with 0.8" H20 pressure difference across the core.  It is from a BMW(320i?) with a core 23"wide, 17" long, 1.25" thick, and a fine fin spacing of about 20 per inch.  It was given to me because the plastic tanks were leaking.  I cleaned it up and welded aluminum tanks onto it.  It is mounted at an oblique angle in the duct.  A photo of the heat exchanger inlet ducts is attached.

 

The oil cooler is a reasonable size and is capable of maintaining 200 degree oil out of the cooler at the above power setting with 2.4" H20 pressure difference across the core. 

 

It should also be noted that this is at a density altitude of about 8000 ft which decreases the cooling capacity relative to sea level.


Steve


From: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> on behalf of Bill Bradburry <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 8:16 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Return to Flight - 2

 

Steve,

 

That is a great chart!  Amazing what you can learn with a little data.

 

At the end of the test, it looks like you revved the engine up to 5000, then 5500, then 6000 for a couple of minutes and the temp seemed to stabilize at about 205 for both water and oil.  Is this where your test engine runs with only prop air to cool it?  What kind of HP do you think the turbo Renesis is doing at 6000?  That seems like a really good cooling system to cool what is probably over 200 HP with just the prop blast.  Do you think it would do that if cowled?

 

Bill

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster