X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "Tracy" Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com ([209.85.216.171] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.10) with ESMTPS id 7229193 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:35:47 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.216.171; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id i17so1837039qcy.16 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:35:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:from:content-type:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=zF+lEwV1c9WQ2eKZLn93aqxxvZSsBs2Elkj/8QkGaV4=; b=Oidk7jtAFK/EQWcDKCNFxvtNzND/aLVISjNdIbdCXFHIUD4wgvZhwQE0fSSmgptdBq moCWAnaffbAay4UMmezuBUXCPhC1eBjslQ71hi6KGyhBojd28h7HZ2bopETh70B9F4LD yHcRPJ403h056I3QvQTz7YDZWi/1YbYaNhxTp0pDpad/0QX2Xg3rX6+Cs+I8qb6s2IAu FmuNfPQT85Y/G1trSPquNEopWlWTZiJEh6sYVPPjA3Ty+eRmMPMZZqj+PWB6PALhY0EJ rsKSmcl6xASOX4KbW8t08qBORvkKB87O6ZJxxlUasxeB59ThHWpXXgrg31h2PVdNHakx bIzw== X-Received: by 10.224.124.67 with SMTP id t3mr50620087qar.20.1413934513185; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.4] (118.sub-70-209-0.myvzw.com. [70.209.0.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u62sm9618151qge.37.2014.10.21.16.35.11 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: GRT EIS and Mazda sensors? References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2B9715DC-7580-417D-9847-29FA50C3FE42 X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12A405) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:35:09 -0400 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-2B9715DC-7580-417D-9847-29FA50C3FE42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I used to use a GRT EIS and that was the case with mine too. I thought the c= hances of it working with the stock sensors was so small that I never tried t= hem. Tracy Sent from my iPad > On Oct 21, 2014, at 19:03, William Schertz w= rote: >=20 > Grand rapids supplied the sensors, in particular, they said the oil sender= was calibrated for the unit. > Bill > =20 > From: Charlie England > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 3:19 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] GRT EIS and Mazda sensors? > =20 > For those flying with GRT EIS engine monitors:=20 > =20 > Were you able to use the stock Mazda water & oil temp sensors? > =20 > Thanks, > =20 > Charlie --Apple-Mail-2B9715DC-7580-417D-9847-29FA50C3FE42 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I used to use a GRT EIS and that was the case with mine too.  I thought the chances of it working with the stock sensors was so small that I never tried them.

Tracy

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 21, 2014, at 19:03, William Schertz <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:

Grand rapids supplied the sensors, in particular, they said the oil sender was calibrated for the unit.
Bill
 
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 3:19 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] GRT EIS and Mazda sensors?
 
For those flying with GRT EIS engine monitors: 
 
Were you able to use the stock Mazda water & oil temp sensors?
 
Thanks,
 
Charlie
--Apple-Mail-2B9715DC-7580-417D-9847-29FA50C3FE42--